On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:24:09AM +0100, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Good thinking! But unfortunately, this won't work if you do it > like this. > > You have to give the same commandline as context's texexec does. > Dvips does not support mapfile \specials, so unless you feed it > the needed files on the commandline, it will read the wrong map > file. > > The used commandline is included as a comment at the top of the > generated postscript file, so the best approach is to do a run of > texexec --dvi and then extract the commandline from the output > (and insert the -d 127 , of course)
Done that. Now, it does seem that the map files are being looked at. However, doing this results in a new PS file, where the fonts for math look awful. The specimen is here: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/test.ps And the dvips command extracted from the PS file is: dvips -d 127 -u +texnansi-public-lm -u +original-base -u \ +ec-public-lm -u +ec-base -u +lm-ec -u +lm-math -u +8r-base -u \ +t5-base -u +original-ams-base -u +original-ams-euler -u \ original-public-lm test And the dvips output is at the same place: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/dvips_output.bz2 Hope I'm getting somewhere. Thanks for the support! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
