On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 15:28, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2-3-2010 14:49, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> hm, but for me name compatibility with every latex math package is no
> objective; i'd rather that we're unicode math compiant (and i don't care too
> much what route latex follows)
I would not care too much about LaTeX either, but what does Unicode
compliance mean?
\symbol{DOWNWARDS ARROW LEFTWARDS OF UPWARDS ARROW}?
>> Out of the whole vector only some 5-10% of glyphs works now.
>
> is it that bad? interesting is that lucida was one of the first fonts
> context supported so the transition from yandy->tug has really messed up
> things then
It's not about messing things up, but about missing "mathname=" in
char-def.lua for all the unicode entries for special glyphs. If those
glyphs worked in MKII from the very beginning, they won't work before
one adds several entries to
But of course they should work flawlessly when they are entered as
unicode characters. They only fail to work when one enters
\zrangeantirestriction for example.
Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
