On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:52:31PM +0100, "H. Özoguz" wrote: > >The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it > >doesn’t embolden it. > > > >The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t > >be a problem because fonts are cheap nowadays. > > > >Wolfgang > > Thanks, I hoped the it could really embold ist (like I did it in CorelDraw). > > Of course, money is not the problem at all - I am using it commercially, so > the company should by any arabic font I would suggest. But it is very hard > to find an modern font, which is capable of typsetting Quran, with full > supprt and all special symbols (wich are not a part of standard modern > arabic)
http://amirifont.org/ > - and more hard to find such a find in this style (Uthmanic). There is no such a style, it is just a simplified (dumbed down) Naskh style used only in one single Mushaf. Why is that a requirement? Regards, Khaled ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
