Hi Hans,
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:13:34 -0600, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
On 8/3/2015 4:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
what would be the proper name for such a conversion? simplearabic?
arabicdigits?
[myconversion]
[١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,١٠,
١١,١٢,١٣,١٤,١٥,١٦,١٧,١٨,١٩,٢٠,
۲۱,۲۲,۲۳,۲٤,۲٥,۲٦,۲۷,۲۸,۲۹,۳۰,
> another million entries
the next beta will have:
\setuplinenumbering[conversion=arabicdecimals]
What's wrong with 'persiannumerals' and 'arabicnumerals' which we had
before? They are not supposed to by synonymous for abjadnumerals... In any
case we need
U+: [0030-0039] -> [0660-0669]: arabicdecimals
U+: [0030-0039] -> [06F0-06F9]: persiandecimals
Best wishes
Idris
--
Idris Samawi Hamid
Professor of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
