Hi Hans, Idris, Talal, Some years ago we had a discussion on the issue, but I don’t remember where we ended up… In my opinion, I think that the numberings should be maned as follows:
arabicnumerals: should be ١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,٠ persiannumerals: should be ۱ ۲ ۳ ۴ ۵ ۶ ۷ ۸ ۹ ۰ abjadnumerals: should be الف، ب، ج، د، ه، و، ز،….. As of today it seems that « persiannumerals » results in what should be named abjadnuemrals, and this is not correct. Best regards: OK > On 03 Aug 2015, at 16:56, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > > > what would be the proper name for such a conversion? simplearabic? > arabicdigits? > >> [myconversion] >> [١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,١٠, >> ١١,١٢,١٣,١٤,١٥,١٦,١٧,١٨,١٩,٢٠, >> ۲۱,۲۲,۲۳,۲٤,۲٥,۲٦,۲۷,۲۸,۲۹,۳۰, > > another million entries > > Hans > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com > | www.pragma-pod.nl > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
