On 02/16/2018 11:57 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
you can look into the cache and see what names.tma mentions (and save
the xits bit for later comparison when it fails)
as i can't replicate it here i need that info
Hans,
I have compared the two files names.tma from my laptop (has the error)
and my desktop (works); both run some form of x86_64 linux and have
context minimals 2018.02.12. The only difference I could spot relating
to xits was this: the working computer has these entries in the table
["otf"] = {
["xits"]=752,
["xitsbold"]=749,
["xitsbolditalic"]=750,
["xitsitalic"]=751,
["xitsmath"]=754,
["xitsmathbold"]=753,
["xitsmathregular"]=754,
["xitsregular"]=752,
},
the not-working one only has:
["otf"] = {
["xits"]=749,
["xitsbold"]=744,
["xitsbolditalic"]=745,
["xitsitalic"]=746,
["xitsmath"]=747,
["xitsmathbold"]=748,
},
so the entry for xitsmathregular is missing. But I have no idea if this
is helpful for you. If you want, I can zip the two files and send them
to you.
All best
Thomas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
