> On 11 Nov 2016, at 07:29, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alfredo, 
> 
> I tested with latest pfring from github but still packets are segregated to 
> different applications. 

Please provide me the output of "cat /proc/net/pf_ring/info"

> After your latest change, We need to use cluster_per_flow_2_tuple only right 
> to segregate traffic on outer ip addresses ?

Correct

> Should we load pfring module with enable_frag_coherence=1? I have tested with 
> using this or without this with the latest package from github. 

enable_frag_coherence is set to 1 by default

Alfredo

> 
> 
> Regrads,
> Gautam
> 
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Chandrika Gautam 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Thanks Alfredo for an update.
> I will update you once merge with latest 
> PFRing.
> Regards,
> Gautam
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 10:38 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Gautam
>> your traffic is GTP traffic and the hash was computed on the inner headers 
>> when present,
>> I did change the behaviour computing the hash on the outer header when using 
>> cluster_per_flow_2_tuple, and introduced
>> new hash types cluster_per_inner_* for computing hash on inner header, when 
>> present.
>> Please update from github or wait for new packages.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Alfredo
>> 
>>> On 10 Nov 2016, at 11:41, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Alfredo 
>>> 
>>> PFA the traces having vlan and not vlan.
>>> 
>>> To add more details to this, there are 2 observations - 
>>> 1. We ran a bigger file of 1 lakh packets, out of which fragments of same 
>>> packet got distributed across application
>>> 
>>> 2. We ran with the attached file and observed that the 2 packets were going 
>>> to one application and rest of the packets were to other one.
>>> 
>>> Thanks & Regards
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Hi Gautam
>>> could you provide a pcap we can use to reproduce this?
>>> 
>>> Alfredo
>>> 
>>> > On 10 Nov 2016, at 11:22, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected] 
>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > We are using PFRING cluster feature and using cluster_2_tuple and 2 
>>> > applications
>>> > are reading from same cluster id.
>>> >
>>> > We have observed that the packets having same source and destination ip 
>>> > addresses are getting distributed across 2 applications which has 
>>> > completely tossed our logic as we are trying to assemble the fragments in 
>>> > our applications.
>>> >
>>> > Is there any bug in PFRING clustering mechanism which is causing this.
>>> >
>>> > Using PFRING 6.2.0 and  pfring is loaded with below command -
>>> > insmod pf_ring.ko min_num_slots=409600 enable_tx_capture=0
>>> >
>>> > I tried with this also.
>>> > insmod pf_ring.ko min_num_slots=409600 enable_tx_capture=0 
>>> > enable_frag_coherence=1
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Gautam
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>>> > <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>>> 
>>> <multiple_fragments_id35515.pcap><multiple_fragments_id35515_wo_vlan.pcap>_______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc 
>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to