# cat /proc/net/pf_ring/info
PF_RING Version          : 6.5.0 (unknown)
Total rings              : 0

Standard (non ZC) Options
Ring slots               : 409600
Slot version             : 16
Capture TX               : No [RX only]
IP Defragment            : No
Socket Mode              : Standard
Cluster Fragment Queue   : 0
Cluster Fragment Discard : 0

Regards,
Gautam

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> On 11 Nov 2016, at 07:29, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alfredo,
>
> I tested with latest pfring from github but still packets are segregated
> to different applications.
>
>
> Please provide me the output of "cat /proc/net/pf_ring/info"
>
> After your latest change, We need to use cluster_per_flow_2_tuple only
> right to segregate traffic on outer ip addresses ?
>
>
> Correct
>
> Should we load pfring module with enable_frag_coherence=1? I have tested
> with using this or without this with the latest package from github.
>
>
> enable_frag_coherence is set to 1 by default
>
> Alfredo
>
>
>
> Regrads,
> Gautam
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Chandrika Gautam <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Alfredo for an update.
>> I will update you once merge with latest
>> PFRing.
>> Regards,
>> Gautam
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2016, at 10:38 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gautam
>> your traffic is GTP traffic and the hash was computed on the inner
>> headers when present,
>> I did change the behaviour computing the hash on the outer header when
>> using cluster_per_flow_2_tuple, and introduced
>> new hash types cluster_per_inner_* for computing hash on inner header,
>> when present.
>> Please update from github or wait for new packages.
>>
>> Regards
>> Alfredo
>>
>> On 10 Nov 2016, at 11:41, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alfredo
>>
>> PFA the traces having vlan and not vlan.
>>
>> To add more details to this, there are 2 observations -
>> 1. We ran a bigger file of 1 lakh packets, out of which fragments of same
>> packet got distributed across application
>>
>> 2. We ran with the attached file and observed that the 2 packets were
>> going to one application and rest of the packets were to other one.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gautam
>>> could you provide a pcap we can use to reproduce this?
>>>
>>> Alfredo
>>>
>>> > On 10 Nov 2016, at 11:22, Chandrika Gautam <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > We are using PFRING cluster feature and using cluster_2_tuple and 2
>>> applications
>>> > are reading from same cluster id.
>>> >
>>> > We have observed that the packets having same source and destination
>>> ip addresses are getting distributed across 2 applications which has
>>> completely tossed our logic as we are trying to assemble the fragments in
>>> our applications.
>>> >
>>> > Is there any bug in PFRING clustering mechanism which is causing this.
>>> >
>>> > Using PFRING 6.2.0 and  pfring is loaded with below command -
>>> > insmod pf_ring.ko min_num_slots=409600 enable_tx_capture=0
>>> >
>>> > I tried with this also.
>>> > insmod pf_ring.ko min_num_slots=409600 enable_tx_capture=0
>>> enable_frag_coherence=1
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Gautam
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>
>>
>> <multiple_fragments_id35515.pcap><multiple_fragments_id35515
>> _wo_vlan.pcap>_______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to