Gautam
they are not all the same, you have 4 flows 199.223.102.6 -> 49.103.1.132 and 2 
flows 220.159.237.103 -> 203.118.242.166

Alfredo

> On 11 Nov 2016, at 10:51, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> If you check the outer src and dst IP addresses of all these 6 packets are 
> same, then shouldn't all these 6 packets go to 1 pfcount instance if we have 
> chosen cluster_type as cluster_per_2_flow?
> 
> Regards,
> Gautam
> 
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> This is what I am receiving, it looks correct as they are distributed by 
> 2-tuple:
> 
> # ./pfcount -i eth2 -c 99 -H 2 -v 1 -m
> Using PF_RING v.6.5.0
> Capturing from eth2 [mac: 00:25:90:E0:7F:45][if_index: 86][speed: 10000Mb/s]
> # Device RX channels: 1
> # Polling threads:    1
> pfring_set_cluster returned 0
> Dumping statistics on /proc/net/pf_ring/stats/25212-eth2.14
> 10:45:00.296354612 [RX][if_index=86][10:F3:11:B3:06:01 -> 00:10:DB:FF:10:01] 
> [IPv4][199.223.102.6:2152 <http://199.223.102.6:2152/> -> 49.103.1.132:2152 
> <http://49.103.1.132:2152/>] 
> [l3_proto=UDP][TEID=0x40611E78][tunneled_proto=TCP][IPv4][216.58.194.110:443 
> <http://216.58.194.110:443/> -> 100.83.201.244:43485 
> <http://100.83.201.244:43485/>] [hash=4182140810][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0] 
> [caplen=128][len=226][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=42]
> 10:45:00.296358154 [RX][if_index=86][10:F3:11:B3:06:01 -> 00:10:DB:FF:10:01] 
> [IPv4][199.223.102.6:0 <http://199.223.102.6:0/> -> 49.103.1.132:0 
> <http://49.103.1.132:0/>] 
> [l3_proto=UDP][hash=4182140827][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0] 
> [caplen=128][len=1328][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> 10:45:00.296359417 [RX][if_index=86][10:F3:11:B3:06:01 -> 00:10:DB:FF:10:01] 
> [IPv4][199.223.102.6:2152 <http://199.223.102.6:2152/> -> 49.103.1.132:2152 
> <http://49.103.1.132:2152/>] 
> [l3_proto=UDP][TEID=0x40611E78][tunneled_proto=TCP][IPv4][216.58.194.97:443 
> <http://216.58.194.97:443/> -> 100.83.201.244:55379 
> <http://100.83.201.244:55379/>] [hash=4182140810][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0] 
> [caplen=128][len=226][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=42]
> 10:45:00.296361197 [RX][if_index=86][10:F3:11:B3:06:01 -> 00:10:DB:FF:10:01] 
> [IPv4][199.223.102.6:0 <http://199.223.102.6:0/> -> 49.103.1.132:0 
> <http://49.103.1.132:0/>] 
> [l3_proto=UDP][hash=4182140827][tos=0][tcp_seq_num=0] 
> [caplen=128][len=1328][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=0]
> ^CLeaving...
> 
> # ./pfcount -i eth2 -c 99 -H 2 -v 1 -m
> Using PF_RING v.6.5.0
> Capturing from eth2 [mac: 00:25:90:E0:7F:45][if_index: 86][speed: 10000Mb/s]
> # Device RX channels: 1
> # Polling threads:    1
> pfring_set_cluster returned 0
> Dumping statistics on /proc/net/pf_ring/stats/25213-eth2.15
> 10:45:00.296362749 [RX][if_index=86][00:10:DB:FF:10:01 -> 00:00:0C:07:AC:01] 
> [IPv4][220.159.237.103:2152 <http://220.159.237.103:2152/> -> 
> 203.118.242.166:2152 <http://203.118.242.166:2152/>] 
> [l3_proto=UDP][TEID=0x3035D0A8][tunneled_proto=TCP][IPv4][49.96.0.26:80 
> <http://49.96.0.26/> -> 10.160.153.151:60856 <http://10.160.153.151:60856/>] 
> [hash=2820071437][tos=104][tcp_seq_num=0] 
> [caplen=128][len=1514][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=14][l4_offset=34][payload_offset=42]
> 10:45:00.296365824 [RX][if_index=86][00:10:DB:FF:10:01 -> 00:00:0C:07:AC:01] 
> [vlan 210] [IPv4][220.159.237.103:0 <http://220.159.237.103:0/> -> 
> 203.118.242.166:0 <http://203.118.242.166:0/>] 
> [l3_proto=UDP][hash=2820071454][tos=104][tcp_seq_num=0] 
> [caplen=74][len=74][eth_offset=0][l3_offset=18][l4_offset=38][payload_offset=0]
> ^CLeaving...
> 
> Alfredo
> 
>> On 11 Nov 2016, at 10:41, Chandrika Gautam <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> I tried with above. I found the same result one instance of pfcount 
>> receiving 2 packets and 6 in other instance for the file shared 
>> multiple_fragments_id35515_wo_vlan.pcap. 
>> 
>> Are you receiving all 6 packets in one pfcount instance ?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Chandrika

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to