Hi Ajit,
please file an issue request

Luca
On 03/08/2016 12:28 PM, Ajit Sarnaik wrote:
> Hello Simone,
>
> Is there support for GRE tunnels in ntopng please.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ajit
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Ajit Sarnaik <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hello Simone,
>
>     Thanks for the quick response. By host statistics, you mean
>     native, right? We have checked that and also did a tcpdump to
>     verify that we are getting responses.  Below is the json that is
>     returned from one of the runs,
>
>     hbase-metadata-devjson:
>     {
>       u'ip': {u'ipVersion': 4, u'ip': u'172.25.3.132', u'localHost':
>     False},
>       u'icmp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>       u'pktStats.recv': {},
>       u'contacts': {
>         u'client': { u'192.168.254.1': u'62', u'239.255.255.250': u'1'},
>         u'server': {}
>       },
>       u'tcp_sent': {u'bytes': 117789898, u'packets': 86207},
>       u'symbolic_name': u'172.25.3.132',
>       u'throughput_trend_pps': u'Stable',
>       u'ndpiStats': {
>         u'Unknown': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 347}, u'bytes':
>     {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 69306}},
>         u'SSDP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 1}, u'bytes':
>     {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 180}},
>         u'RTSP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 85860}, u'bytes':
>     {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 117720592}}
>       },
>       u'pktStats.sent': {
>         u'upTo6500': 678,
>         u'upTo1024': 2201,
>         u'upTo2500': 836,
>         u'upTo128': 1082,
>         u'upTo1518': 73338,
>         u'upTo512': 1346,
>         u'upTo256': 6695,
>         u'upTo9000': 65
>       },
>       u'dns': {u'rcvd': {u'stats': {}}, u'sent': {u'stats': {}}},
>       u'mac_address': u'02:C4:92:CA:3F:FD',
>       u'throughput_bps': 0.0,
>       u'throughput_pps': 0.0,
>       u'other_ip_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>       u'sent': {u'bytes': 117790078, u'packets': 86208},
>       u'http': {},
>       u'other_ip_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>       u'throughput_trend_bps': u'Stable',
>       u'flows.as_client': 63,
>       u'activityStats': {u'1456688976': 60, u'1456689036': 48,
>     u'1456688916': 60, u'1456688856': 60},
>       u'rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>       u'flows.as_server': 0,
>       u'asn': 14138,
>       u'localHost': True,
>       u'udp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>       u'udp_sent': {u'bytes': 180, u'packets': 1},
>       u'num_alerts': 0,
>       u'epp': {u'rcvd': {}, u'sent': {}},
>       u'systemHost': False,
>       u'asname': u'AS14138',
>       u'icmp_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>       u'tcp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}
>     }
>
>
>     Notice the tcp_sent, which does have data. Let me know if I can
>     provide any other information that can help.
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Ajit
>
>     On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Simone Mainardi <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         ifnum is not recognized as valid param. Since it's unknown, I
>         guess ntopng is replying with host statistics related to the
>         currently active interface. Check hosts statistics against the
>         active interface.
>
>         Simone
>
>         On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ajit Sarnaik
>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>             Hello Simone,
>
>             Here is the request,
>
>             
> "http://localhost:6398/lua/host_get_json.lua?ifnum=4&host=172.25.3.130";
>
>             We do get the Tx stats, but Rx (response from server) is 0.
>
>             Regards,
>
>             Ajit
>
>             On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Simone Mainardi
>             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>                 Ajit, are you calling the http
>                 "host_get_json.lua" endpoint directly? Could you
>                 please post the full http request you make?
>
>                 simone
>
>                 On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Ajit Sarnaik
>                 <[email protected]
>                 <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>                     Hello Folks,
>
>                     Just starting using ntop. We would like to capture
>                     network statistics for bidirectional traffic and
>                     we are using "host_get_json.lua" script to
>                     accomplish this. What we are noticing is that the
>                     Tx traffic stats are appropriate, where as the Rx
>                     traffic stats are 0. We have done a tcpdump to
>                     determine if the response are being received on
>                     the interface, and they are coming in. Below is
>                     the snippet of he config file. 
>
>                     #        Specifies  the  network  interface or
>                     collector endpoint to be used by ntopng for network
>                     #        monitoring. On Unix you can specify both
>                     the interface name  (e.g.  lo)  or  the  numeric
>                     #        interface id as shown by ntopng -h. On
>                     Windows you must use the interface number instead.
>                     #        Note that you can specify -i multiple
>                     times in order to instruct ntopng to create  multi‐
>                     #        ple interfaces.
>                     #
>                     --interface eth0
>                     --interface eth1
>                     #
>                     #       -w|--http-port
>                     #        Sets the HTTP port of the embedded web
>                     server.
>                     #
>                     --http-port 6398
>                     #
>                     #       -m|--local-networks
>                     #        ntopng determines the ip addresses and
>                     netmasks for each active interface. Any traffic on
>                     #        those  networks  is considered local.
>                     This parameter allows the user to define additional
>                     #        networks and subnetworks whose traffic is
>                     also considered local in  ntopng  reports.  All
>                     #        other hosts are considered remote. If not
>                     specified the default is set to 192.168.1.0/24
>                     <http://192.168.1.0/24>.
>                     #
>                     #        Commas  separate  multiple  network
>                      values.  Both netmask and CIDR notation may be used,
>                     #        even mixed together, for instance
>                     "131.114.21.0/24,10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0
>                     <http://131.114.21.0/24,10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0>".
>                     #
>                     --local-networks
>                     "172.25.1.0/24,172.25.2.0/24,172.25.3.128/25
>                     <http://172.25.1.0/24,172.25.2.0/24,172.25.3.128/25>"
>                     #
>                     #       -n|--dns-mode
>                     #        Sets the DNS address resolution mode: 0 -
>                     Decode DNS responses  and  resolve  only  local
>                     #        (-m)  numeric  IPs  1  -  Decode DNS
>                     responses and resolve all numeric IPs 2 - Decode DNS
>                     #        responses and don't resolve numeric IPs 3
>                     - Don't decode DNS responses and don't  resolve
>                     #
>                     -n=3
>
>                     Have any of you seen this behavior. Would
>                     appreciate any help in this regards. Any pointers
>                     to FAQs would also be helpful.
>
>                     Regards,
>
>                     -- 
>                     Ajit Sarnaik
>
>                     _______________________________________________
>                     Ntop mailing list
>                     [email protected]
>                     <mailto:[email protected]>
>                     http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
>
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 Ntop mailing list
>                 [email protected]
>                 <mailto:[email protected]>
>                 http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
>
>
>
>             -- 
>             Ajit Sarnaik
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Ntop mailing list
>             [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>             http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Ntop mailing list
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Ajit Sarnaik
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ajit Sarnaik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to