Hello Luca, Are GRE tunnels supported by NTOPNG please. Will file the issue request.
Regards, Ajit On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Luca Deri <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ajit, > please file an issue request > > Luca > > On 03/08/2016 12:28 PM, Ajit Sarnaik wrote: > > Hello Simone, > > Is there support for GRE tunnels in ntopng please. > > Regards, > > Ajit > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Ajit Sarnaik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Simone, >> >> Thanks for the quick response. By host statistics, you mean native, >> right? We have checked that and also did a tcpdump to verify that we are >> getting responses. Below is the json that is returned from one of the runs, >> >> hbase-metadata-devjson: >> { >> u'ip': {u'ipVersion': 4, u'ip': u'172.25.3.132', u'localHost': False}, >> u'icmp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >> u'pktStats.recv': {}, >> u'contacts': { >> u'client': { u'192.168.254.1': u'62', u'239.255.255.250': u'1'}, >> u'server': {} >> }, >> u'tcp_sent': {u'bytes': 117789898, u'packets': 86207}, >> u'symbolic_name': u'172.25.3.132', >> u'throughput_trend_pps': u'Stable', >> u'ndpiStats': { >> u'Unknown': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 347}, u'bytes': >> {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 69306}}, >> u'SSDP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 1}, u'bytes': {u'rcvd': >> 0, u'sent': 180}}, >> u'RTSP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 85860}, u'bytes': >> {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 117720592}} >> }, >> u'pktStats.sent': { >> u'upTo6500': 678, >> u'upTo1024': 2201, >> u'upTo2500': 836, >> u'upTo128': 1082, >> u'upTo1518': 73338, >> u'upTo512': 1346, >> u'upTo256': 6695, >> u'upTo9000': 65 >> }, >> u'dns': {u'rcvd': {u'stats': {}}, u'sent': {u'stats': {}}}, >> u'mac_address': u'02:C4:92:CA:3F:FD', >> u'throughput_bps': 0.0, >> u'throughput_pps': 0.0, >> u'other_ip_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >> u'sent': {u'bytes': 117790078, u'packets': 86208}, >> u'http': {}, >> u'other_ip_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >> u'throughput_trend_bps': u'Stable', >> u'flows.as_client': 63, >> u'activityStats': {u'1456688976': 60, u'1456689036': 48, u'1456688916': >> 60, u'1456688856': 60}, >> u'rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >> u'flows.as_server': 0, >> u'asn': 14138, >> u'localHost': True, >> u'udp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >> u'udp_sent': {u'bytes': 180, u'packets': 1}, >> u'num_alerts': 0, >> u'epp': {u'rcvd': {}, u'sent': {}}, >> u'systemHost': False, >> u'asname': u'AS14138', >> u'icmp_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >> u'tcp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0} >> } >> >> >> Notice the tcp_sent, which does have data. Let me know if I can provide >> any other information that can help. >> >> Regards, >> >> Ajit >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Simone Mainardi < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ifnum is not recognized as valid param. Since it's unknown, I guess >>> ntopng is replying with host statistics related to the currently active >>> interface. Check hosts statistics against the active interface. >>> >>> Simone >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ajit Sarnaik < <[email protected]> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Simone, >>>> >>>> Here is the request, >>>> >>>> "http://localhost:6398/lua/host_get_json.lua?ifnum=4&host=172.25.3.130" >>>> >>>> We do get the Tx stats, but Rx (response from server) is 0. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Ajit >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Simone Mainardi < <[email protected]> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ajit, are you calling the http "host_get_json.lua" endpoint directly? >>>>> Could you please post the full http request you make? >>>>> >>>>> simone >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Ajit Sarnaik < >>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Just starting using ntop. We would like to capture network statistics >>>>>> for bidirectional traffic and we are using "host_get_json.lua" script to >>>>>> accomplish this. What we are noticing is that the Tx traffic stats are >>>>>> appropriate, where as the Rx traffic stats are 0. We have done a tcpdump >>>>>> to >>>>>> determine if the response are being received on the interface, and they >>>>>> are >>>>>> coming in. Below is the snippet of he config file. >>>>>> >>>>>> # Specifies the network interface or collector endpoint to >>>>>> be used by ntopng for network >>>>>> # monitoring. On Unix you can specify both the interface name >>>>>> (e.g. lo) or the numeric >>>>>> # interface id as shown by ntopng -h. On Windows you must use >>>>>> the interface number instead. >>>>>> # Note that you can specify -i multiple times in order to >>>>>> instruct ntopng to create multiā >>>>>> # ple interfaces. >>>>>> # >>>>>> --interface eth0 >>>>>> --interface eth1 >>>>>> # >>>>>> # -w|--http-port >>>>>> # Sets the HTTP port of the embedded web server. >>>>>> # >>>>>> --http-port 6398 >>>>>> # >>>>>> # -m|--local-networks >>>>>> # ntopng determines the ip addresses and netmasks for each >>>>>> active interface. Any traffic on >>>>>> # those networks is considered local. This parameter allows >>>>>> the user to define additional >>>>>> # networks and subnetworks whose traffic is also considered >>>>>> local in ntopng reports. All >>>>>> # other hosts are considered remote. If not specified the >>>>>> default is set to 192.168.1.0/24. >>>>>> # >>>>>> # Commas separate multiple network values. Both netmask >>>>>> and CIDR notation may be used, >>>>>> # even mixed together, for instance " >>>>>> 131.114.21.0/24,10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0". >>>>>> # >>>>>> --local-networks "172.25.1.0/24,172.25.2.0/24,172.25.3.128/25" >>>>>> # >>>>>> # -n|--dns-mode >>>>>> # Sets the DNS address resolution mode: 0 - Decode DNS >>>>>> responses and resolve only local >>>>>> # (-m) numeric IPs 1 - Decode DNS responses and resolve >>>>>> all numeric IPs 2 - Decode DNS >>>>>> # responses and don't resolve numeric IPs 3 - Don't decode DNS >>>>>> responses and don't resolve >>>>>> # >>>>>> -n=3 >>>>>> >>>>>> Have any of you seen this behavior. Would appreciate any help in this >>>>>> regards. Any pointers to FAQs would also be helpful. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ajit Sarnaik >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Ntop mailing list >>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected] >>>>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop> >>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Ntop mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ajit Sarnaik >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ntop mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ntop mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ajit Sarnaik >> > > > > -- > Ajit Sarnaik > > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing > [email protected]http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > -- Ajit Sarnaik
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
