Hello Luca,

Are GRE tunnels supported by NTOPNG please. Will file the issue request.

Regards,

Ajit

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Luca Deri <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ajit,
> please file an issue request
>
> Luca
>
> On 03/08/2016 12:28 PM, Ajit Sarnaik wrote:
>
> Hello Simone,
>
> Is there support for GRE tunnels in ntopng please.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ajit
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Ajit Sarnaik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Simone,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response. By host statistics, you mean native,
>> right? We have checked that and also did a tcpdump to verify that we are
>> getting responses.  Below is the json that is returned from one of the runs,
>>
>> hbase-metadata-devjson:
>> {
>>   u'ip': {u'ipVersion': 4, u'ip': u'172.25.3.132', u'localHost': False},
>>   u'icmp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>>   u'pktStats.recv': {},
>>   u'contacts': {
>>     u'client': { u'192.168.254.1': u'62', u'239.255.255.250': u'1'},
>>     u'server': {}
>>   },
>>   u'tcp_sent': {u'bytes': 117789898, u'packets': 86207},
>>   u'symbolic_name': u'172.25.3.132',
>>   u'throughput_trend_pps': u'Stable',
>>   u'ndpiStats': {
>>     u'Unknown': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 347}, u'bytes':
>> {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 69306}},
>>     u'SSDP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 1}, u'bytes': {u'rcvd':
>> 0, u'sent': 180}},
>>     u'RTSP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 85860}, u'bytes':
>> {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 117720592}}
>>   },
>>   u'pktStats.sent': {
>>     u'upTo6500': 678,
>>     u'upTo1024': 2201,
>>     u'upTo2500': 836,
>>     u'upTo128': 1082,
>>     u'upTo1518': 73338,
>>     u'upTo512': 1346,
>>     u'upTo256': 6695,
>>     u'upTo9000': 65
>>   },
>>   u'dns': {u'rcvd': {u'stats': {}}, u'sent': {u'stats': {}}},
>>   u'mac_address': u'02:C4:92:CA:3F:FD',
>>   u'throughput_bps': 0.0,
>>   u'throughput_pps': 0.0,
>>   u'other_ip_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>>   u'sent': {u'bytes': 117790078, u'packets': 86208},
>>   u'http': {},
>>   u'other_ip_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>>   u'throughput_trend_bps': u'Stable',
>>   u'flows.as_client': 63,
>>   u'activityStats': {u'1456688976': 60, u'1456689036': 48, u'1456688916':
>> 60, u'1456688856': 60},
>>   u'rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>>   u'flows.as_server': 0,
>>   u'asn': 14138,
>>   u'localHost': True,
>>   u'udp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>>   u'udp_sent': {u'bytes': 180, u'packets': 1},
>>   u'num_alerts': 0,
>>   u'epp': {u'rcvd': {}, u'sent': {}},
>>   u'systemHost': False,
>>   u'asname': u'AS14138',
>>   u'icmp_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0},
>>   u'tcp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}
>> }
>>
>>
>> Notice the tcp_sent, which does have data. Let me know if I can provide
>> any other information that can help.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ajit
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Simone Mainardi < <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> ifnum is not recognized as valid param. Since it's unknown, I guess
>>> ntopng is replying with host statistics related to the currently active
>>> interface. Check hosts statistics against the active interface.
>>>
>>> Simone
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ajit Sarnaik < <[email protected]>
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Simone,
>>>>
>>>> Here is the request,
>>>>
>>>> "http://localhost:6398/lua/host_get_json.lua?ifnum=4&host=172.25.3.130";
>>>>
>>>> We do get the Tx stats, but Rx (response from server) is 0.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Ajit
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Simone Mainardi < <[email protected]>
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ajit, are you calling the http "host_get_json.lua" endpoint directly?
>>>>> Could you please post the full http request you make?
>>>>>
>>>>> simone
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Ajit Sarnaik <
>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just starting using ntop. We would like to capture network statistics
>>>>>> for bidirectional traffic and we are using "host_get_json.lua" script to
>>>>>> accomplish this. What we are noticing is that the Tx traffic stats are
>>>>>> appropriate, where as the Rx traffic stats are 0. We have done a tcpdump 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> determine if the response are being received on the interface, and they 
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> coming in. Below is the snippet of he config file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #        Specifies  the  network  interface or collector endpoint to
>>>>>> be used by ntopng for network
>>>>>> #        monitoring. On Unix you can specify both the interface name
>>>>>>  (e.g.  lo)  or  the  numeric
>>>>>> #        interface id as shown by ntopng -h. On Windows you must use
>>>>>> the interface number instead.
>>>>>> #        Note that you can specify -i multiple times in order to
>>>>>> instruct ntopng to create  multi‐
>>>>>> #        ple interfaces.
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> --interface eth0
>>>>>> --interface eth1
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> #       -w|--http-port
>>>>>> #        Sets the HTTP port of the embedded web server.
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> --http-port 6398
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> #       -m|--local-networks
>>>>>> #        ntopng determines the ip addresses and netmasks for each
>>>>>> active interface. Any traffic on
>>>>>> #        those  networks  is considered local. This parameter allows
>>>>>> the user to define additional
>>>>>> #        networks and subnetworks whose traffic is also considered
>>>>>> local in  ntopng  reports.  All
>>>>>> #        other hosts are considered remote. If not specified the
>>>>>> default is set to 192.168.1.0/24.
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> #        Commas  separate  multiple  network  values.  Both netmask
>>>>>> and CIDR notation may be used,
>>>>>> #        even mixed together, for instance "
>>>>>> 131.114.21.0/24,10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0".
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> --local-networks "172.25.1.0/24,172.25.2.0/24,172.25.3.128/25"
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> #       -n|--dns-mode
>>>>>> #        Sets the DNS address resolution mode: 0 - Decode DNS
>>>>>> responses  and  resolve  only  local
>>>>>> #        (-m)  numeric  IPs  1  -  Decode DNS responses and resolve
>>>>>> all numeric IPs 2 - Decode DNS
>>>>>> #        responses and don't resolve numeric IPs 3 - Don't decode DNS
>>>>>> responses and don't  resolve
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> -n=3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have any of you seen this behavior. Would appreciate any help in this
>>>>>> regards. Any pointers to FAQs would also be helpful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ajit Sarnaik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]
>>>>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop>
>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ajit Sarnaik
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ntop mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ajit Sarnaik
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ajit Sarnaik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing 
> [email protected]http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
>



-- 
Ajit Sarnaik
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to