Hell Simone, This issue does not address the GRE question though.
Regards, Ajit On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Simone Mainardi <[email protected]> wrote: > Ajit, please refer to the following issue: > https://github.com/ntop/ntopng/issues/432 > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Ajit Sarnaik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Luca, >> >> Are GRE tunnels supported by NTOPNG please. Will file the issue request. >> >> Regards, >> >> Ajit >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Luca Deri <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ajit, >>> please file an issue request >>> >>> Luca >>> >>> On 03/08/2016 12:28 PM, Ajit Sarnaik wrote: >>> >>> Hello Simone, >>> >>> Is there support for GRE tunnels in ntopng please. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Ajit >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Ajit Sarnaik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Simone, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the quick response. By host statistics, you mean native, >>>> right? We have checked that and also did a tcpdump to verify that we are >>>> getting responses. Below is the json that is returned from one of the >>>> runs, >>>> >>>> hbase-metadata-devjson: >>>> { >>>> u'ip': {u'ipVersion': 4, u'ip': u'172.25.3.132', u'localHost': False}, >>>> u'icmp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >>>> u'pktStats.recv': {}, >>>> u'contacts': { >>>> u'client': { u'192.168.254.1': u'62', u'239.255.255.250': u'1'}, >>>> u'server': {} >>>> }, >>>> u'tcp_sent': {u'bytes': 117789898, u'packets': 86207}, >>>> u'symbolic_name': u'172.25.3.132', >>>> u'throughput_trend_pps': u'Stable', >>>> u'ndpiStats': { >>>> u'Unknown': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 347}, u'bytes': >>>> {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 69306}}, >>>> u'SSDP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 1}, u'bytes': {u'rcvd': >>>> 0, u'sent': 180}}, >>>> u'RTSP': {u'packets': {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 85860}, u'bytes': >>>> {u'rcvd': 0, u'sent': 117720592}} >>>> }, >>>> u'pktStats.sent': { >>>> u'upTo6500': 678, >>>> u'upTo1024': 2201, >>>> u'upTo2500': 836, >>>> u'upTo128': 1082, >>>> u'upTo1518': 73338, >>>> u'upTo512': 1346, >>>> u'upTo256': 6695, >>>> u'upTo9000': 65 >>>> }, >>>> u'dns': {u'rcvd': {u'stats': {}}, u'sent': {u'stats': {}}}, >>>> u'mac_address': u'02:C4:92:CA:3F:FD', >>>> u'throughput_bps': 0.0, >>>> u'throughput_pps': 0.0, >>>> u'other_ip_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >>>> u'sent': {u'bytes': 117790078, u'packets': 86208}, >>>> u'http': {}, >>>> u'other_ip_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >>>> u'throughput_trend_bps': u'Stable', >>>> u'flows.as_client': 63, >>>> u'activityStats': {u'1456688976': 60, u'1456689036': 48, >>>> u'1456688916': 60, u'1456688856': 60}, >>>> u'rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >>>> u'flows.as_server': 0, >>>> u'asn': 14138, >>>> u'localHost': True, >>>> u'udp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >>>> u'udp_sent': {u'bytes': 180, u'packets': 1}, >>>> u'num_alerts': 0, >>>> u'epp': {u'rcvd': {}, u'sent': {}}, >>>> u'systemHost': False, >>>> u'asname': u'AS14138', >>>> u'icmp_sent': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0}, >>>> u'tcp_rcvd': {u'bytes': 0, u'packets': 0} >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> Notice the tcp_sent, which does have data. Let me know if I can provide >>>> any other information that can help. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Ajit >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Simone Mainardi < <[email protected]> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> ifnum is not recognized as valid param. Since it's unknown, I guess >>>>> ntopng is replying with host statistics related to the currently active >>>>> interface. Check hosts statistics against the active interface. >>>>> >>>>> Simone >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ajit Sarnaik < >>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Simone, >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the request, >>>>>> >>>>>> " >>>>>> http://localhost:6398/lua/host_get_json.lua?ifnum=4&host=172.25.3.130 >>>>>> " >>>>>> >>>>>> We do get the Tx stats, but Rx (response from server) is 0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ajit >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Simone Mainardi < <[email protected]> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ajit, are you calling the http "host_get_json.lua" endpoint >>>>>>> directly? Could you please post the full http request you make? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> simone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Ajit Sarnaik < >>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Folks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just starting using ntop. We would like to capture network >>>>>>>> statistics for bidirectional traffic and we are using >>>>>>>> "host_get_json.lua" >>>>>>>> script to accomplish this. What we are noticing is that the Tx traffic >>>>>>>> stats are appropriate, where as the Rx traffic stats are 0. We have >>>>>>>> done a >>>>>>>> tcpdump to determine if the response are being received on the >>>>>>>> interface, >>>>>>>> and they are coming in. Below is the snippet of he config file. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> # Specifies the network interface or collector endpoint >>>>>>>> to be used by ntopng for network >>>>>>>> # monitoring. On Unix you can specify both the interface >>>>>>>> name (e.g. lo) or the numeric >>>>>>>> # interface id as shown by ntopng -h. On Windows you must >>>>>>>> use the interface number instead. >>>>>>>> # Note that you can specify -i multiple times in order to >>>>>>>> instruct ntopng to create multi‐ >>>>>>>> # ple interfaces. >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> --interface eth0 >>>>>>>> --interface eth1 >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # -w|--http-port >>>>>>>> # Sets the HTTP port of the embedded web server. >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> --http-port 6398 >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # -m|--local-networks >>>>>>>> # ntopng determines the ip addresses and netmasks for each >>>>>>>> active interface. Any traffic on >>>>>>>> # those networks is considered local. This parameter >>>>>>>> allows the user to define additional >>>>>>>> # networks and subnetworks whose traffic is also considered >>>>>>>> local in ntopng reports. All >>>>>>>> # other hosts are considered remote. If not specified the >>>>>>>> default is set to 192.168.1.0/24. >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # Commas separate multiple network values. Both netmask >>>>>>>> and CIDR notation may be used, >>>>>>>> # even mixed together, for instance " >>>>>>>> 131.114.21.0/24,10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0". >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> --local-networks "172.25.1.0/24,172.25.2.0/24,172.25.3.128/25" >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # -n|--dns-mode >>>>>>>> # Sets the DNS address resolution mode: 0 - Decode DNS >>>>>>>> responses and resolve only local >>>>>>>> # (-m) numeric IPs 1 - Decode DNS responses and resolve >>>>>>>> all numeric IPs 2 - Decode DNS >>>>>>>> # responses and don't resolve numeric IPs 3 - Don't decode >>>>>>>> DNS responses and don't resolve >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> -n=3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have any of you seen this behavior. Would appreciate any help in >>>>>>>> this regards. Any pointers to FAQs would also be helpful. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Ajit Sarnaik >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Ntop mailing list >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected] >>>>>>>> <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop> >>>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Ntop mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ajit Sarnaik >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Ntop mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Ntop mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ajit Sarnaik >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ajit Sarnaik >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ntop mailing >>> [email protected]http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ntop mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ajit Sarnaik >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ntop mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > -- Ajit Sarnaik
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
