Me thinks you missed one more entry... Q. ntop starts up with this: WARNING: Discarded network 172.20.0.0/16: this is the local network. A. No worries. The message means exactly what it says - it's a warning that you gave the local network as one of the parameter(s) to -m. Since the local networks are always local, ntop doesn't need to make them pseudo-local.
So you don't need to specify anything that can be discovered from the ifconfig data. Anything else that you want ntop to treat as local, must be specified via -m to make it pseudo-local. -----Burton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin C McCarty Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Ntop] Multiple subnets? Morning List, Can someone enlighten me on the use of the -m flag please. I am trying to monitor two separate networks over a WAN. Would the syntax be : ./ntop -u user -W 3000 -m xxx.xxx.xxx.0 /24 , yyy.yyy.yyy.0 /24 ? Or would I not need to list the local subnet that ntop is already on? I appreciate the help. I have read the FAQ's Burton, pages 21 through 26 are helpful, but I wonder what the result will be with multiple routers involved via the WAN. We will see. I used to be able to see where local machines were connected on the Internet, but that seems to evade the current install: RedHat8, ntop-2.1.3, dell optiplex gx1. What can I do to enable this feature? All have a good day! Thanks-- Kevin McCarty CCNP CSCO10448370 Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector "Obstacles are those annoying little bumps that occur when you take your eyes off your goals" Henry Ford _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
