Simple stuff - say an FAQ entry - just drop 'em in an email. If it's a whole document, like a user manual (hint hint) , what's convenient for you?
For publishing, if it's graphical, I'm finding I prefer pdf - it seems safest across the range of OSes. -----Burton |\ _,,,---,,_ "If I purr, you must have fed me. /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ If the network purrs, it must <|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' be ntop!" -----Pixel '---''(_/--' `-'\_) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin C McCarty Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Ntop] Multiple subnets? Burton, Indeed, I did miss that. Appreciate the quick response. What format do you want additional documentation submitted as? Thanks-- Kevin McCarty CCNP CSCO10448370 Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector "Obstacles are those annoying little bumps that occur when you take your eyes off your goals" Henry Ford "Burton M. Strauss III" <Burton @ntopsupport.com> Sent by: ntop-admin 02/13/2003 12:04 PM Please respond to ntop To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: [Ntop] Multiple subnets? Me thinks you missed one more entry... Q. ntop starts up with this: WARNING: Discarded network 172.20.0.0/16: this is the local network. A. No worries. The message means exactly what it says - it's a warning that you gave the local network as one of the parameter(s) to -m. Since the local networks are always local, ntop doesn't need to make them pseudo-local. So you don't need to specify anything that can be discovered from the ifconfig data. Anything else that you want ntop to treat as local, must be specified via -m to make it pseudo-local. -----Burton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin C McCarty Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Ntop] Multiple subnets? Morning List, Can someone enlighten me on the use of the -m flag please. I am trying to monitor two separate networks over a WAN. Would the syntax be : ./ntop -u user -W 3000 -m xxx.xxx.xxx.0 /24 , yyy.yyy.yyy.0 /24 ? Or would I not need to list the local subnet that ntop is already on? I appreciate the help. I have read the FAQ's Burton, pages 21 through 26 are helpful, but I wonder what the result will be with multiple routers involved via the WAN. We will see. I used to be able to see where local machines were connected on the Internet, but that seems to evade the current install: RedHat8, ntop-2.1.3, dell optiplex gx1. What can I do to enable this feature? All have a good day! Thanks-- Kevin McCarty CCNP CSCO10448370 Computer Sciences Corporation Defense Sector "Obstacles are those annoying little bumps that occur when you take your eyes off your goals" Henry Ford _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
