Could be hardware resources, what type of box do you have it on. I have mine on a PIII 733, Raid 5, One gig ram, RH 9 and it has been up since 3.1 was released. RH 9 seems to be the best platform for ntop. But, I have a FreeBSD 4.9 box that is simailar but no RAID and a bit less ram that has been up forever also. Both monitor very busy segments.
Shane ----- Original Message ----- From: "Antonio Mitarotondo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 2:30 AM Subject: Re: [Ntop] NTop > On Friday 21 January 2005 16:42, Mercer, Jeff wrote: > > In my experience, while Ntop is a wicked cool tool, it's stability is > > dependent on many factors, not just the OS. > > This is for sure! > > > Until Ntop 3.1, I could rarely keep a runtime up for more than a day or so. > > The biggest issue generally being resource utilization (i.e. memory). But > > I'll say that 3.1 definitely seems SIGNIFICANTLY more stable for me than > > any previous version. > > I did not see any significant stability improvement switching from 3.0 to 3.1, > so maybe we have to look elsewhere... Do you think that our stability problem > could be much more a hardware resources issue than a operating system one? > > Thanks. > > --Tony > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
