Trying to get a call into M$ right now, to settle this matter, figures
looks like the powers that be didn't update the support contract.. Sigh.
Why do I put myself thought this nonsense. 

 

Z

 

________________________________

From: Joe Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: HP DL380 G5 and Win2k3 R2 Standard not showing maximum
memory in OS

 

 

Not meaning this towards you Ken, but that just seems like nonsense.
Another reason not to like Microsoft.  The literature on Server 2K3
Standard says you can use 4GB of RAM, and yet, they hard-coded a limit
below that?  Typical...

 

Joe Heaton

 

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 6:06 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: HP DL380 G5 and Win2k3 R2 Standard not showing maximum
memory in OS

 

 

Nothing is going to change. You are running Windows Server 2003 Standard
Edition x86. This has a built-in limitation (in the code) which prevents
Windows using addresses beyond 0xFFFFFFFFF

 

If you are using x86, put Enterprise Edition on there (with /PAE). Or
put x64 Standard Edition on there.

 

The limitation you are running into is hard coded into the OS.

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2008 1:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: HP DL380 G5 and Win2k3 R2 Standard not showing maximum
memory in OS

 

 

Bingo, 

 

That is what I was looking for. I will follow up and try out the /PAE
switch and see if anything changes. I take that my previous post with
the boot.ini settings is the correct usage of the /PAE switch. 

 

Z

 

________________________________

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 8:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: HP DL380 G5 and Win2k3 R2 Standard not showing maximum
memory in OS

 

 

Some says that it's because the BIOS reserves 512MB "physical" address
space just below the 4GB line and put the real 512MB RAM above the line.
Thus only the PAE kernel sees that 512MB RAM. 

This isn't a correct explanation of what you are seeing.

 

The BIOS doesn't reserve "RAM". PCI (and PCI-X and PCIe) devices can
reserve memory addresses. These overlap with addresses that the Windows
OS uses. The BIOS has masked these addresses, making the unavailable to
Windows to address the physical RAM.

 

The use of the /PAE switch enables three layers of page tables to be
used. If you are familiar with B-trees in databases, you'll be familiar
with the concept of tables of tables of pages of memory (3 layers).
Without PAE you only get tables of pages (two layers). The extra layer
of tables makes available a whole set of addresses that wouldn't
otherwise be available. These addresses can be used to address the
physical RAM that Windows can't otherwise get to.

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: Ziots, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2008 12:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: HP DL380 G5 and Win2k3 R2 Standard not showing maximum
memory in OS

 

 

Ken, 

 


re: Myth: PAE increases the virtual address space beyond 4GB 


Wednesday, August 18, 2004 9:05 AM by timchen 

There is one thing quite interesting about /PAE. On some machines with
4GB RAM installed, Task Manager shows only 3.5GB physical memory.
However, if you switch to the PAE kernel, all 4GB is shown. 

Some says that it's because the BIOS reserves 512MB "physical" address
space just below the 4GB line and put the real 512MB RAM above the line.
Thus only the PAE kernel sees that 512MB RAM. 

I'm not sure if the explanation is true or not, but the symptom is
confirmed. 

 

 

EZ

 

________________________________

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 8:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: HP DL380 G5 and Win2k3 R2 Standard not showing maximum
memory in OS

 

 

There is no such limit using a 32bit Windows OS. What you observe is a
practical average given modern hardware. But I have a HP ML330 in my
house that "loses" about 64MB of memory when using standard Windows
Server 2003 x86 edition, not ~600MB.

 

Read the links and comments from:

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/08/22/218527.aspx

 

Or buy/read the Windows Internals book by Mark Russinovich/David Solomon

 

Or read the articles on memory management here:

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/kernel/wmm.mspx

(the memory management whitepaper is well worth reading)

 

This seems to come up every Rnd() months on this list :-)

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: Jeffrey Showen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2008 12:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: HP DL380 G5 and Win2k3 R2 Standard not showing maximum
memory in OS

 

 

I thought a 32-bit OS was limited to 3.4GB of RAM unless you use the
Physical Address Extensions in the boot.ini file.  The file is a
protected file in the root of C:\ (or whatever your boot partition is)
so you will need to unhide protected OS files onder folder options.
Open boot.ini with notepad and add the /pae switch to the end of the
last line (starts with "multi(0) disk(0)rdisk"... etc) and then reboot.
You should then be able to see all your memory.

 

Cheers,

 

Jeff

 

 

 










 










 
 










 










 
 
 










 










 
 










 










 
 
 
 










 










 
 










 










 
 
 










 










 
 










 










 
 
 
 
 
 
    

 

 










 










 
 










 










 
 
 










 










 
 










 










 
 
 
 
 
    

 

 










 










 
 










 










 
 
 
 
    

 

 










 










 
 
 
    

 

 










 
 
    

No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1213 - Release Date:
1/7/2008 9:14 AM 

 

 





 
    


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1213 - Release Date:
1/7/2008 9:14 AM



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to