First, I said 945 when I meant 965 on chipsets... "Ken Cornetet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/14/2008 12:30:33 PM:
> My point of curiosity was to find out where exactly where > server 2003 standard and XP are throttled. Was it at the > physical address space level, or the amount of usable RAM > level? I have a sneaking suspicion if I loaded Server 2003 on my Latitude, I would still be stuck with about 3.5 gigs of reported memory free. I don't think it's an OS problem, I think it's a fundamental hardware issue caused by the X86 architecture. Eric Eskam =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any position of the U.S. Government "The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange protein; it rejects it." - P. B. Medawar ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
