That was the quote I got from VMWare 2 years ago.  I figured it would still
be close I am suprised it has dropped that much.  Here anything over the
cost of the hardware is considered excessive.  I have been begging for a new
physical server to back up what we have now and the $15K I have asked for
has been turned down out of hand.  That would replace 3 physical boxes and
allow what I have already virtualized to be shared/moved to a beefer box.

Jon

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:47 AM, NTSysAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Where you get 5K from? Nearer 3
>
>
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:36 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Need opinion on Blade Servers
>
>
>
> Some of us have little or no choice in the matter but is she can get the
> big bucks and training then I would go for it as well but $5k just to run 3
> or maybe 4 virtual machines it a lot and that does not even include the cost
> of training, just the ESX software.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Mike Semon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think virtualization of any kind for this project would be overkill. I
> don't use VMware Server in production. VMware server like other hosted
> virtualization
>
> solutions does not scale like those that utilize hyper-visor technology.
> Hosted virtualization products also have higher virtualization overhead so
> loose
>
> some of the advantages of virtualization. Good in test and dev
> environments but not something I would unleash in production environment.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:18 AM
>
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>
> *Subject:* Re: Need opinion on Blade Servers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to