I've got an old 900 Celeron desktop at home, that I upgraded to Win XP
from Win 2K. The machine had 256 MB and seemed to run OK, but I wanted
more speed, and added 256MB to get to 512MB. WOW, what a difference,
like night and day. So, I figured if 512MB was that good and the move
from 256 to 512 made that big a difference, surely an upgrade to 1 GB
was in order. I smiled as I installed the 1 GB, and then turned on the
computer. What a HUGE disappointment, the difference wasn't even
noticable. Pretty much the same result with my 1.6 GH Dell laptop.
Upgrading from 256 to 512 made a difference, but when I went to 1 GB,
once again, I was very disappointed. Oh, last week I upgraded my 2.8GH
workstation at work from 512 MB to 2 GB. Very disappointing!!!
 

Murray 

 

________________________________

From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Why XP is doomed


I see what you had on your system but from where I was at, Win 2k had 64
MB of RAM we started our XP systems with 128 MB and rapidly moved that
to 256.  Near the end of our installs for XP we were spec'ing systems
with 1 GB of RAM.  Yes Windows runs better with more RAM but not all
companies would purchase a lot to begin with.  Now it is easier, at
least for me to simply tell the powers that be we need to start at 2 GB
and for very good performance go to 4 GB with Vista.  Not a lot of
questions are asked why.  Most of these staffers remember that most of
the RAM above 64 MB in Win 98SE was wasted now they can see the value of
purchasing more but when Win 2k and XP came out they would argue every
penny and RAM was what they complained about the most.
 
Jon


On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Ziots, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:


        Funny,
        
        I have to disagree with XP needing 2X the memory Windows 2000
does, I
        ran both Windows 2000 and XP with 1GB RAM on same machine with
no
        issues. ( Win2k SP4 Pro, then wiped and rebuilt with XP SP2,
still fine
        performance)
        
        Its when you short-change the system with like 512MB and through
a ton
        of applications on the system that are memory intensive is when
you run
        into issues.
        
        If that is one favor you can do with any Microsoft OS, DON'T
skimp on
        the RAM, your computer will be happy you did, and you will too.
        
        Z
        
        Edward E. Ziots
        Network Engineer
        Lifespan Organization
        MCSE,MCSA,MCP,Security+,Network+,CCA
        Phone: 401-639-3505
        

        -----Original Message-----
        From: David Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:59 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        
        Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed
        
        
        But ever new OS needs drivers.
        Every new os has always had greater requirements than the last.
        Vista has had issues, oems providing quality drivers being one.
Vista
        compatable being another.
        XP neeed double the memory of Windows 2000. XP sp2 needed double
again
        over XP sp0, and broke hardware if the bios was not up to date.
        It has its good points and its bad points. I use it and would
not go
        back.
        
        
        Regards,
        David Houston
        Dame Computers Ltd.
        Office: +35312873159
        Mobile: +353876810844
        Suppprt: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        
        From: "Matthew W. Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        To: "NT System Admin Issues"
<ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
        
        Sent: 11/05/08 08:44
        Subject: RE: Why XP is doomed
        
        Hold on there... If an OS requires new drivers and more
horsepower... we
        can't blame the new OS?
        
        Oh yes we can.
        
        --Matt ross
         _____
        
        From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
         Vista wasn't perfect out of the gate, but it's not the piece of
junk
         people think it is, either. A huge reason Vista has a negative
image
        is
         that the hardware OEMs have been releasing buggy drivers for
it--if
        they
         released drivers for it at all--and have been shipping Vista
computers
         that either don't have enough horsepower or are bloated with
crapware
        or
         bad drivers (or all three). It all adds up to a bad experience
for
         users, and the OS gets the blame.
        
        
        
        
        
        ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
        ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
        
        ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
        ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
        



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to