with our clients, regardless of whether the client is using a 200 or
2000, they all login to the netextender client using their AD
credentials. With some we have it configured to do two phase, with a
session temp password that gets emailed to the user.
Kurt Buff wrote:
Interesting. Their product comparison table indicates no such
integration for the 200 - did something change recently?
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, wjh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have 200s and 2000s at different clients. They are easy to setup and
easy to manage. Both integrate with AD without a problem. The 2000 with
current firmware will support mac and linux clients. The 200 will only
support Windows, unless they have very recently released a firmware upgrade.
I did run into one caveat. They have not released firmware that supports
64-bit Vista yet. I had one exec who purchased his own machine that
happened to be 64-bit Vista and he now is VPN-less until the new firmware
comes out. They have documentation on it already, but no release date.
Bill
Varios flaDerek Lidbom wrote:
For what it's worth, my reseller told me the SSL 200 was a "bounce box"
(in that they sold them and had them returned immediately because the
product just wasn't up to speed. That was about a year ago. I have had
experience with an SSL VPN 2000. Once you get over the learning curve
(mostly nomenclature), it seems to work alright. My experience is with
them running a very limited capacity though (only a handful of users,
only allowing access to terminal server and SMB shares).
-Derek
-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Sonicwall SSL VPN appliance?
Is anyone using one of these?
Can you speak specifically to the differences between the 200 and the
2000 models?
I'm looking at the comparison chart, and the 200 doesn't seem to
support AD integration, which might be OK, but I'm really looking for
quality of experience. Does the 200 really support 50 users well, or
if I have that many should I move to the 2000?
Kurt
PS - I'm abandoning SSLExplorer - the publisher took the latest rev
private - it's no longer GPL'ed, and although I could stay at the last
GPL rev, nobody's yet taken up maintenance of that, nor forked it. I
was on top of paying for help, but when a publisher revokes the GPL,
they're not playing the game any more, and I'll drop the product as
soon as I can.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Derek Lidbom
Director of IT, Trone
336.812.2010
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the
designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error
and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of
it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and
deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
