You're allowed to kick and scream along the way, though, right? Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel
-----Original Message----- From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Services question Yep, I've seen both sides of the fence ... Some corporate setups where they did not want to budget for remote equipment, and executive level insisted on enabling remote access for POE ... Sometimes you just have to do what the business decides Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Systems, Networks, & Security -----Original Message----- From: Charlie Kaiser [mailto:charl...@golden-eagle.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Terminal Services question For me it's the opposite. I only allow approved machines/users to get remote access of any kind. No POE at all unless approved at C level... It's all in how you define your criteria, I guess. *********************** Charlie Kaiser charl...@golden-eagle.org Kingman, AZ *********************** > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 12:55 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Terminal Services question > > privately owned equipment is a presumption on my part based on 'home' > access ... Although some agencies deploy govt owned equipment, they're > normally issued along with a vpn/remote access solution built in, at > least with my experience with Federal govt... > > > > Erik Goldoff > IT Consultant > Systems, Networks, & Security ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
