If I take all the enhancements advertised and in my junk folder the total comes to about 192" -that's what the math comes to...3" here, 4" there. It *would* be cumulative right? :-P
Dave From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:05 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 Are you kidding?? 4.0" is my goal for when I finish taking these "enhancement" pills. -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:44 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 That's pretty cool that you can forecast your future IQ score. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 I typo'd that. I' need about 3.5 diopters of correction. I'll hit the big four-oh in about a year and a half myself. -sc From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:38 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 I'ved needed them since 4th grade. I started to notice some of the characteristic vision problems that start to hit around 40. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com<mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote: Old enuff to know better, yet still manage to be an idiot most of the time. I've needed corrective lenses since 7th grade. Glasses for several years, then contacts. I had Lasik a year ago[1]. I need about +2.5 diopters of correction in each eye. -sc [1] Lasik rocks. From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com<mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:17 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 Out of curiosity, how old are you? On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com<mailto:scaes...@caesare.com>> wrote: I prefer to shrink the scale on most docs and have _TWO_ side by side pages. Well, actually, that's a lie. I'm almost always bouncing between multiple windows, so when I'm editing I actually have a full height doc (@ 80%)on the right and then room on the left to get at other things (CMD windows, emails, etc...) With a decent resolution monitor, and ClearType enabled, there are very few cases where I find I need to use the Office Apps or a browser at 100% scale. I find 75-80% works well, and I can usually get a full page in there. Ditto for CMD windows.... I permanently crank the font down to a ~9 point(as well as go green-on-black) and can get a couple of 50-line tall windows rolling without sucking up all the screen real estate. Lasik not included. -sc From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com<mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com>] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 Two words: protrait mode. I changed my 22" to portrait and have never looked back. PDF files, page at a time and readable. Websites, no scrolling to get to the bottom (or significantly less). Since most websites are aligned for 1024 horizontal resolution, you won't have to scroll left or right. And, I find I prefer a long screen than a wide screen when remoting into servers. On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sherry Abercrombie <saber...@gmail.com<mailto:saber...@gmail.com>> wrote: So yesterday afternoon just before I leave for the day, the HelpDesk/Desktop lead comes to my cube and asks this question: "Would you be willing to give up one of your 19" monitors for a new 23" monitor?" Well DUH..... So now I get to setup my new 23" Samsung monitor..... -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
