Not to get the waterworks started again, but here is a very touching
(and tragic) story:
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/pixar-up-movie-2468059-home-show
 

________________________________

From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09


I laughed and I cried.  What a fantastic movie. Point.


On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Maglinger, Paul <pmaglin...@scvl.com>
wrote:


        Yep.  Good movie, but didn't realize that parts of it would be
so dark.

________________________________

        From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:38 AM 

        To: NT System Admin Issues
        
        Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09
        

        "Up"?
         

________________________________

        From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:34 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09
        
        
        That would be so..    Squirrel!!!       cool.

________________________________

        From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:28 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09
        
        

        If I had those, I'd record the dog barking in to it.

         

        -sc

         

        From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:19 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

         

        What if I just want the talking dog tags?  That's cooooooool...

         

________________________________

        From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:28 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

        If I didn't get my daily spate of such valuable offers, how else
would I have been able to be the first on my block to get one of
these?!?

         

        https://www.snuggiefordogs.com/flare/next

         

        -sc

         

        From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:24 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

         

        Glad to see someone else gets some use from their spam folder
too. Awfully nice of those guys to keep mailing me offers for pills,
get-rich-quick schemes, and other useful stuff.
        
        http://raythestray.blogspot.com/2009/07/spams-and-scams.html

        2009/8/6 Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com>

        Are you kidding??

         

        4.0" is my goal for when I finish taking these "enhancement"
pills.

         

        -sc

         

        From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] 
        Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:44 AM

        
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

         

        That's pretty cool that you can forecast your future IQ score. 

         

        Shook

         

        From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] 
        Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:41 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

         

        I typo'd that. I' need about 3.5 diopters of correction.

         

        I'll hit the big four-oh in about a year and a half myself.

         

        -sc

         

        From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
        Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:38 AM
        To: NT System Admin Issues
        Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

         

        I'ved needed them since 4th grade.  

        I started to notice some of the characteristic vision problems
that start to hit around 40.

        
        
         

        On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Steven M. Caesare
<scaes...@caesare.com> wrote:

        Old enuff to know better, yet still manage to be an idiot most
of the time.

         

        I've needed corrective lenses since 7th grade. Glasses for
several years, then contacts. I had Lasik a year ago[1]. I need about
+2.5 diopters of correction in each eye.

         

        -sc

         

        [1] Lasik rocks.

         

        From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
        Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:17 AM 

        
        To: NT System Admin Issues

        Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

         

        Out of curiosity, how old are you?

        On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Steven M. Caesare
<scaes...@caesare.com> wrote:

        I prefer to shrink the scale on most docs and have _TWO_ side by
side pages.

         

        Well, actually, that's a lie. I'm almost always bouncing between
multiple windows, so when I'm editing I actually have a full height doc
(@ 80%)on the right and then room on the left to get at other things
(CMD windows, emails, etc...)

         

        With a decent resolution monitor, and ClearType enabled, there
are very few cases where I find I need to use the Office Apps or a
browser at 100% scale. I find 75-80% works well, and I can usually get a
full page in there. 

         

        Ditto for CMD windows.... I permanently crank the font down to a
~9 point(as well as go green-on-black) and can get a couple of 50-line
tall windows rolling without sucking up all the screen real estate.

         

        Lasik not included.

         

        -sc

         

        From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
        Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:23 AM 

        
        To: NT System Admin Issues

        Subject: Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09

         

        Two words: protrait mode.

         

        I changed my 22" to portrait and have never looked back.  PDF
files, page at a time and readable.  Websites, no scrolling to get to
the bottom (or significantly less).  Since most websites are aligned for
1024 horizontal resolution, you won't have to scroll left or right.
And, I find I prefer a long screen than a wide screen when remoting into
servers.  

        On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sherry Abercrombie
<saber...@gmail.com> wrote:

        So yesterday afternoon just before I leave for the day, the
HelpDesk/Desktop lead comes to my cube and asks this question:  "Would
you be willing to give up one of your 19" monitors for a new 23"
monitor?"    Well DUH.....
        
        So now I get to setup my new 23" Samsung monitor.....
        
        -- 
        Sherry Abercrombie
        
        "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic." 
        Arthur C. Clarke

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

        
        
        
        -- 
        "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you
put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I
am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that
could provoke such a question."
        
        http://raythestray.blogspot.com

         

         

         

         

         

         

         

        

         

        

         

        

         

        

         

        

         

        

         

        

         


 

 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to