I think this is one of their best ever movies...the kids loved it, the adults "get" it. You are my master. I love you.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Evan Brastow <ebras...@automatedemblem.com>wrote: > Yeah, I have to tell you, I had no idea what the movie was about, either, > but my wife, who’s so far outlived all the doctor’s expectations after four > surgeries for a malignant brain tumor, really wanted to see it. Had I KNOWN > what it was about, I would have 1) Waited outside the theater while she > watched it or 2) Brought four Kleenex boxes for me, or 3) probably both. > Nonetheless, she loved it, and I couldn’t stop crying. But then, I cry at > insurance commercials, too… lol > > > > > > *From:* David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:27 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > Not to get the waterworks started again, but here is a very touching (and > tragic) story: > > http://www.ocregister.com/articles/pixar-up-movie-2468059-home-show > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:21 PM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > I laughed and I cried. What a fantastic movie. Point. > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Maglinger, Paul <pmaglin...@scvl.com> > wrote: > > Yep. Good movie, but didn't realize that parts of it would be so dark. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:38 AM > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > "Up"? > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:34 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > That would be so.. Squirrel!!! cool. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:28 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > If I had those, I’d record the dog barking in to it. > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:19 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > What if I just want the talking dog tags? That's cooooooool... > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:28 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > If I didn’t get my daily spate of such valuable offers, how else would I > have been able to be the first on my block to get one of these?!? > > > > https://www.snuggiefordogs.com/flare/next > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:24 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > Glad to see someone else gets some use from their spam folder too. Awfully > nice of those guys to keep mailing me offers for pills, get-rich-quick > schemes, and other useful stuff. > > http://raythestray.blogspot.com/2009/07/spams-and-scams.html > > 2009/8/6 Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> > > Are you kidding?? > > > > 4.0” is my goal for when I finish taking these “enhancement” pills. > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:44 AM > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > That’s pretty cool that you can forecast your future IQ score. > > > > Shook > > > > *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:41 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > I typo’d that. I’ need about 3.5 diopters of correction. > > > > I’ll hit the big four-oh in about a year and a half myself. > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:38 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > I'ved needed them since 4th grade. > > I started to notice some of the characteristic vision problems that start > to hit around 40. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> > wrote: > > Old enuff to know better, yet still manage to be an idiot most of the time. > > > > I’ve needed corrective lenses since 7th grade. Glasses for several years, > then contacts. I had Lasik a year ago[1]. I need about +2.5 diopters of > correction in each eye. > > > > -sc > > > > [1] Lasik rocks. > > > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:17 AM > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > > *Subject:* Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > Out of curiosity, how old are you? > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> > wrote: > > I prefer to shrink the scale on most docs and have _*TWO*_ side by side > pages. > > > > Well, actually, that’s a lie. I’m almost always bouncing between multiple > windows, so when I’m editing I actually have a full height doc (@ 80%)on the > right and then room on the left to get at other things (CMD windows, emails, > etc…) > > > > With a decent resolution monitor, and ClearType enabled, there are very few > cases where I find I need to use the Office Apps or a browser at 100% scale. > I find 75-80% works well, and I can usually get a full page in there. > > > > Ditto for CMD windows…. I permanently crank the font down to a ~9 point(as > well as go green-on-black) and can get a couple of 50-line tall windows > rolling without sucking up all the screen real estate. > > > > Lasik not included. > > > > -sc > > > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:23 AM > > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > > *Subject:* Re: The "Duh" Question of the Day 8/4/09 > > > > Two words: protrait mode. > > > > I changed my 22" to portrait and have never looked back. PDF files, page > at a time and readable. Websites, no scrolling to get to the bottom (or > significantly less). Since most websites are aligned for 1024 horizontal > resolution, you won't have to scroll left or right. And, I find I prefer a > long screen than a wide screen when remoting into servers. > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sherry Abercrombie <saber...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > So yesterday afternoon just before I leave for the day, the > HelpDesk/Desktop lead comes to my cube and asks this question: "Would you > be willing to give up one of your 19" monitors for a new 23" monitor?" > Well DUH..... > > So now I get to setup my new 23" Samsung monitor..... > > -- > Sherry Abercrombie > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." > Arthur C. Clarke > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into > the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able > rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such > a question." > > http://raythestray.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
