Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com> wrote on 08/29/2009 01:58:15 AM:

> Whilst this would be a bit of pain to set up initially, you could 
> look at having DFS but not replicating the data. When a user moves, 
> at that point, just configure their folder as having two targets 
> (old and new location) so that the data is replicated across. 
> 
> But from what I'm seeing of your requirements, you really just need 
> to have a process in place, rather than any fancy DFS related 
> technology. Work with management so that you are included in the 
> pre-planning/work that's involved when a user moves location (I 
> mean, some other stuff happens right? Security passes, desk 
> allocation, new phone number etc. Get hooked in that process rather 
> than being told about it after the fact).

True. And I've tried. And that might change, in future. 

I still think DFS would be a good (and appropriate) technology for us. 
Hopefully, we can implement that within the next few months ...

> Also, with DFS, EFS encrypted files are not replicated (just in case
> you using that).

We're not, but good to know. Thanks.

> 
> Cheers
> Ken
> 


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to