Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com> wrote on 08/29/2009 01:58:15 AM:
> Whilst this would be a bit of pain to set up initially, you could > look at having DFS but not replicating the data. When a user moves, > at that point, just configure their folder as having two targets > (old and new location) so that the data is replicated across. > > But from what I'm seeing of your requirements, you really just need > to have a process in place, rather than any fancy DFS related > technology. Work with management so that you are included in the > pre-planning/work that's involved when a user moves location (I > mean, some other stuff happens right? Security passes, desk > allocation, new phone number etc. Get hooked in that process rather > than being told about it after the fact). True. And I've tried. And that might change, in future. I still think DFS would be a good (and appropriate) technology for us. Hopefully, we can implement that within the next few months ... > Also, with DFS, EFS encrypted files are not replicated (just in case > you using that). We're not, but good to know. Thanks. > > Cheers > Ken > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~