I am sure your backgrouds would be well received by males but what about the females I doubt they would want to look...then again you could mix it up a bit.
Jon On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Jacob <ja...@excaliburfilms.com> wrote: > I got plenty of ideas for a background for Google. Hmm :P > > > > *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2010 12:15 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Google and stupid background pictures > > > > I stuck one of my Olympic torch Picasa pictures as my background and I > think it looks pretty cool. > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:12 PM, MarvinC <marv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Always odd to hear the very people who should be pushing for change > complain when they're presented. If no one thought to deploy or implement > new strategies things would stay the same. Hint this stale white background. > Other than the complacent minded, who wants that? Why not add some variety > and creativity to the search process? The beauty is having the ability to > change the background to one of your liking. The kewl thing is that 10 - 16 > year old kids who use Google more than Bing for searches are excited by the > changes. So I hope Google keeps this feature and continue to build on it. > The rest of us "old cranky" techheads should chill out. > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr < > michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > LOL! > > -- > ME2 > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Ben Scott <mailvor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The last part might as well read, "After getting complaints from > approximately the entire planet, we realized we had screwed the pooch > big time". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
