Good point. That would have to be a negative. (Unless of course people try Bing, don't like it, and go straight back to Google...)
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Rod Trent <rodtr...@myitforum.com> wrote: > At the same time – headline buzz around the industry is comparing Google to > Bing, which also markets Bing… > > > > *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2010 3:39 PM > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Google and stupid background pictures > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:41 PM, David Mazzaccaro < > david.mazzacc...@hudsonhhc.com> wrote: > > I think that was the market test (which they failed)! > > LOL > > > > I'm not so sure that's true. Like many others, I hated it when I first saw > it, and I still do. What you have to admit, however, is that every single > Google user in the universe now knows that he or she can add a customized > background image to the default Google search page. Annoying the bejeezus > out of a lot of us for a few hours allowed them to gain near 100% knowledge > of a new feature, and I doubt they'll lose any customers because of it. > Conversely, they may gain some new ones b/c you have to have a Google > account to use the feature. > > > > Just a thought. > > > > > > > > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
