You seem to be missing the point that without a centralized mail system that
can automate policy you will actually be *worse* off with a policy that you
can't enforce than having no policy at all.

-Jeff Steward

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:38 PM, John Aldrich
<jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>wrote:

> Well, I'm catching up, because I apparently overlooked William Robbins'
> email question. My statement was I would tell "it" (i.e. Outlook) to move
> everything over whatever time period to an "archive" PST and then delete
> that PST once a month or whatever through a batchfile or whatever....
> Obviously I don't have all the answers.
>
> As for Bill Humphries' question of why would we even HAVE a retention
> policy, it seems to me that it makes good business sense to not have too
> much data available in the (hopefully unlikely) event that we get sued over
> something. Knowing our litigious society, it seems like everyone gets sued
> over SOMETHING eventually. (Note: slight exaggeration for emphasis/effect.)
>
>
>
> From: Bill Humphries [mailto:nt...@hedgedigger.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 2:28 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Email retention
>
> My question would be, if you are in a small business, privately owned
> company environment that doesn't host its own email, why would you get
> lawyers involved and have a retention policy?  It is one thing to develop
> policies if you have granular control over your email environment, but if
> you just have some people POPing their email to local PST files from some
> third-party hosted email system, actually enforcing a retention policy that
> would stand up to judicial review is quite tenuous.
>
> If I was in that environment, my policy would be we have no policy, and if
> for some reason your small business gets a discovery request, you can
> provide what you have.  I don't want some judge threatening someone with
> contempt if the company policy states that we maintain email for 90 days,
> but I can't find a PST lurking somewhere or an employee loses a laptop that
> had the only recent PST on it.
>
> Bill
>
> William Robbins wrote:
> What "it"  are you going to tell exactly?  Even if you set their client to
> do so, what's to keep the user from keeping their "archives" elsewhere?
>
> I guess the short of where I'm going is that PST is a very myopic answer
> that will lead to a very obvious failure to comply.
>
>  - WJR
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:25, John Aldrich <jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>
> wrote:
> That's a good question... maybe tell it to auto-archive anything over a
> certain time and then once a month manually delete the archive PST? :-)
>
>
>
> From: William Robbins [mailto:dangerw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:08 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Email retention
>
> So how do you plan to enforce a policy for individual PST's?
>
>  - WJR
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:28, John Aldrich <jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com>
> wrote:
> That's what I'm dealing with here... a bunch of individual PST files on
> everyone's PCs. Which is what got me to thinking about needing a formal
> retention policy.
>
>
>
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:36 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Email retention
> I'm working for a private firm with no formal retention policy.  Plus, due
> to limited server storage we have to function with PST files.  The big
> problem is that these all become searchable when lawyers require "all
> documentation."  What a pain!  A mail archiving system would be a Godsend
> but the executives have nixed the proposals so far.
>
>
> Roger Wright
> ___
>
> When it's GOOD there ain't nothin' like it, and when it's BAD there ain't
> nothin' like it!
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:29 AM, John Aldrich
> <jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I'll advise my boss that we should seek legal guidance on that. :-)
>
>
> From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:24 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Email retention
>
> IANAL, however, I believe the sticking point may be (for private firms,
> anyway) that if you ever find yourself in litigation, the lawyers will ask
> what your formal retention policy is…
>
> If they find you on either side of that retention policy, you could be up a
> creek, because then they either blast you for not adhering to corporate
> policy, or they say, “Well, since you have emails that are 120 days old,
> even though your policy dictates 90 days, then you must certainly have more
> so, give us EVERYTHING.”
>
> If it were up to me, (HA!) I would get corporate counsel to give me a
> guideline, formalize it as corporate policy, and stick to it.
> Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
> Technology Coordinator
> Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
> jra...@eaglemds.com
> www.eaglemds.com
> ________________________________________
> From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:16 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Email retention
>
> I believe we keep 6 months on tape, latest 2 weeks on SAN.
>
> Don Guyer
> Systems Engineer - Information Services
> Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
> 431 W. Lancaster Avenue
> Devon, PA 19333
> Direct: (610) 993-3299
> Fax: (610) 650-5306
> don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
> From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:14 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Email retention
>
> Our owner wanted 30 days to be standard retention policy for email.
>  Lawyers
> said 90.  We keep everything 90 days.
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Link <jonathan.l...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> There is no standard, it's determined by business requriements and
> regulatory requirements for your industry.
> SOX rules are for publicly traded companies, so you're asking contradictory
> questions.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:04 AM, John Aldrich
> <jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com> wrote:
> What's the standard for email retention for companies which are NOT
> publicly
> traded? What's the SOX rules on email retention? I just helped one of our
> managers open some Outlook data files dating back to 2007 which got me
> thinking about the wisdom of retaining information that long and I wasn't
> sure what the "norm" is for retaining that info.
>
> Thanks...
>
> Thanks,
> John Aldrich
> IT Manager,
> Blueridge Carpet
> 706-276-2001, Ext. 2233
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
> ________________________________________
> Any medical information contained in this electronic message is
> CONFIDENTIAL
> and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to view, copy,
> disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL information. This electronic message
> may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It
> is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and/or entity named as
> recipients in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this
> message, please notify the sender immediately and delete this material from
> your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not
> disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information
> that
> it contains.
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to