“Great Plains users on a few servers, EMR on another, another bunch of servers 
for general apps.  Not possible in Terminal Server”
Huh? Are you talking about this scenario?

 “Your customer wants to install and then publish an application to 3 out of 5 
new 2008 based Terminal Servers in their new farm and  load balance that 
application across the 3 servers in question (but remember, they are not 
licensed for the application to publish it across the remaining 2 servers).  
Now this is a typical example of the kind of administration and application 
deployment that can happen every day in a Citrix environment, but there is a 
slight problem here.  They would need to split the farm containing the 5 
servers in two, because a farm in the Terminal Services 2008 sense is a group 
of servers that are configured identically with applications and the remaining 
2 servers are not.“

I ask because in the strict sense you can put some apps on some TS servers but 
not others.

I’m wondering at what scale it makes sense to choose XenApp vs. TS 2K8? We, for 
example have all of 15 licenses for Citrix (and have got by with just one 
server) and have been that way for over 3 years. I just kicked up to 50 CAL’s 
of W2K8 TS and am creating a simple TS farm of 3 servers, but your comments 
make me curious…

Dave

From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@hnncsb.org]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 8:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Citrix or Windows Terminal Server?

I did just that, Webster.  I tried to save our organization some money by using 
Terminal Server 2008 for our enterprise medical system.  That lasted maybe a 
year of constant issues.  Meanwhile my XenApp systems hummed along quietly.  
Currently I am moving the Terminal Servers XenApp systems.  One thing I really 
like about XenApp is siloing.  Great Plains users on a few servers, EMR on 
another, another bunch of servers for general apps.  Not possible in Terminal 
Server.

So the money I saved was burned by man hours supporting it.

>>> "Webster" <carlwebs...@gmail.com> 10/29/2010 10:12 AM >>>
“I’d love to hear why people would recommend Citrix over TS 2008”

http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9771

At my previous employer, we had several customers that tried moving from 
Presentation Server 4.5 to TS2008, gave up and moved back.  IMNSHO, TS2008 just 
doesn’t scale well for large enterprises unless you have some very experienced 
people around.


Webster

From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org]
Subject: RE: Citrix or Windows Terminal Server?

Last I checked TS licensing was far cheaper than Citrix – see if there’s a big 
price delta. If yes, then see if there’s any reason the cheaper solution 
wouldn’t work. If no big price difference do you have any in-house knowledge 
that knows one app better than the other?  I am in the midst of standing up 
2008 Terminal Servers to replace our aging Citrix Metaframe and 2008 R2 TS is 
very easy to set up.

To add into this question, I’d love to hear why people would recommend Citrix 
over TS 2008. TS 2008’s application management is far better than previous 
Terminal Server versions.


From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
Subject: RE: Citrix or Windows Terminal Server?

It’ll be Server 2008 R2, 64-bit.


From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: Citrix or Windows Terminal Server?

Windows???  Do you mean 2003, 2008 or R2?  If 2003 or 2008, 32-bit or 64-bit?


Webster

From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
Subject: RE: Citrix or Windows Terminal Server?

Windows – the application is Tessitura (http://www.tessitura-network.org), and 
is used for CRM & Ticketing for arts organizations.


From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Subject: RE: Citrix or Windows Terminal Server?

What OS will you be hosting the application on?


From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
Subject: Citrix or Windows Terminal Server?

Hello,

We’re looking at hosting an application for several other arts organizations.  
My thinking is that we should use one of these two technologies – but I’m not 
sure which one.  We’re behind an ISA 2006 firewall, and we’re looking at 
increasing our internet pipe to Cavalier’s Ethernet over Copper product (from a 
T-1) at 5M.

Whichever setup we go with, what logon set-up would be best – we’re running a 
2003 AD (soon to be 2008 R2).

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the 
sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to