In my experience, I only witnessed & reproduced the issue versus Windows
2008 R2 servers.  And they will resolve 99.999% of all queries, just a
select few that present a problem.  So far, none of the problem domain
queries have been business-related.



On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Kennedy, Jim <kennedy...@elyriaschools.org
> wrote:

>  Your results do indicate the EDNS issue. It is universal…it kills all
> 2008 servers that I have seen using DNS. As for the 2K3 server, who is it’s
> forwarder? I will bet it’s a 2K8 server.
>
>
>
> *From:* m b [mailto:midphan12...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 15, 2010 12:13 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: 2K8R2 DNS anomaly
>
>
>
> This becomes more interesting.  ORCA has set up a reply-size test server (
> https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/replysizetest).  The results look
> backwards to me, but follow the pattern of success/failure.  An indication
> that this does have to do with UDP packet size.
>
>
>
> I'm hesitant to start applying the workaround & turning off EDNS
> capability.  Contacting firewall team for their input.
>
>
>
>
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\me>nslookup -type=txt rs.dns-oarc.net. (our 2K8
> server)
>
> Server:  (our 2K8 server)
>
> Address:  (our 2K8 server)
>
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> *** Request to (our 2K8 server) timed-out
>
>
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\me>nslookup -type=txt rs.dns-oarc.net. (our 2k3
> server)
>
> Server:  (our 2k3 server)
>
> Address:  (our 2k3 server)
>
> DNS request timed out.
>     timeout was 2 seconds.
> *** Request to (our 2k3 server) timed-out
>
>
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\me>nslookup -type=txt rs.dns-oarc.net. (our
> 2k8r2 server)
>
> Server:  (our 2k8r2 server)
>
> Address:  (our 2k8r2 server)
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> rs.dns-oarc.net canonical name = rst.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net
> rst.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net       canonical name =
> rst.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net
>
> rst.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net canonical name =
> rst.x3843.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oa
> rc.net
> rst.x3843.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net   text =
>
>         "(our 2k8r2 server) DNS reply size limit is at least 3843"
> rst.x3843.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net   text =
>
>         "(our 2k8r2 server) sent EDNS buffer size 4000"
> rst.x3843.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net   text =
>
>         "Tested at 2010-12-15 16:55:15 UTC"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM, VIPCS <vi...@stny.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Jeffrey just tried an nslookup query (results below) on two WS2K8 servers
> (one is R2) on two different networks and both resolved (both are DCs with
> DNS installed):
>
>
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
>
> Name:    www.insead.edu
>
> Address:  213.182.38.52
>
>
>
> Is it possible an upstream DNS forwarder is blocking access?
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Jeffrey and Mary Jane Harris
>
> VIPCS
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* m b [mailto:midphan12...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:15 AM
>
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* 2K8R2 DNS anomaly
>
>
>
> Within our forest, all domain controllers are DNS servers.  We've been
> working to upgrade from 2K3 to 2K8.  Most of those that are upgraded are
> 2K8R2, while a few are just 2K8.
>
>
>
> I have heard some reports from users that they were unable to access
> certain websites that they were able to access from home.  Today's example
> is www.insead.edu.
>
>
>
> When I do an nslookup against any of our 2K8R2 DNS servers, the lookup
> fails to resolve.  If I do that same lookup against any 2K3 or 2K8 DNS
> server, it is successful.
>
>
>
> I'm not seeing any common event log errors/warnings among the 2K8R2 DNS
> servers.  My only hunch is root hints.  Anyone experienced something
> similar?
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to