The guy obviously does not use the same sig file as you.  Then again, 
perhaps that last part of the sig file hints at the nature of the 
disciplinary action.
--
richard

James Rankin <kz2...@googlemail.com> wrote on 07/01/2011 08:58:31 AM:

> We have a user who is facing disciplinary action for over-use of the
> Internet. He is defending himself, and some of the points he has 
> risen truly make me aware of the fact "a little knowledge is a 
> dangerous thing"...
> 
> He claims that, since he uses Firefox, and Microsoft ISA Server is, 
> in his words, "optimized for use with Internet Explorer and Citrix",
> that the records of his web browsing cannot be accurate, as he was 
> not using Internet Explorer.
> 
> He also claims that when using VPN from home, as he was on a "dual-
> processor Mac", that the timings recorded for his Internet usage are
> inaccurate, as the Mac "works faster and more efficiently than 
> Windows machines, and henceforth creates a skew in time that cannot 
> be accurately recorded by Windows or Microsoft software"
> 
> Finally, he has named the restrictions on his work machine as a 
> contributory factor towards his over-use of the Internet. "The 
> processing time used by the technologies deployed at work, such as 
> Group Policy, AppSense, and ISA Server, create an inaccurate 
> representation of my browsing time, as the pages load and unload 
> slower than they would on, for instance, my dual-processor Mac, 
> therefore the evidence exhibited is inaccurate and inadmissible"
> 
> I hope he does not manage to convince the people on this tribunal 
> that he actually knows what he is talking about.
> 
> -- 
> "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put
> into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I 
> am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that
> could provoke such a question."
> 
> ***** IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER *****
> 
> This document should be read only by those persons to whom it is 
> addressed. If you have received this message it was obviously 
> addressed to you and therefore you can read it, even it we didn't 
> mean to send it to you. However, if the contents of this email make 
> no sense whatsoever then you probably were not the intended 
> recipient, or, alternatively, you are a mindless cretin; either way,
> you should immediately kill yourself and destroy your computer (not 
> necessarily in that order). Once you have taken this action, please 
> contact us.. no, sorry, you can't use your computer, because you 
> just destroyed it, and possibly also committed suicide afterwards, 
> but I am starting to digress...... 
> The originator of this email is not liable for the transmission of 
> the information contained in this communication. Or are they? Either
> way it's a pretty dull legal query and frankly one I'm not going to 
> dwell on. But should you have nothing better to do, please feel free
> to ruminate on it, and please pass on any concrete conclusions 
> should you find them. However, if you pass them on via email, be 
> sure to include a disclaimer regarding liability for transmission.
> In the event that the originator did not send this email to you, 
> then please return it to us and attach a scanned-in picture of your 
> mother's brother's wife wearing nothing but a kangaroo suit, and we 
> will immediately refund you exactly half of what you paid for the 
> can of Whiskas you bought when you went to Pets At Home yesterday. 
> We take no responsibility for non-receipt of this email because we 
> are running Exchange 5.5 and everyone knows how glitchy that can be.
> In the event that you do get this message then please note that we 
> take no responsibility for that either. Nor will we accept any 
> liability, tacit or implied, for any damage you may or may not incur
> as a result of receiving, or not, as the case may be, from time to 
> time, notwithstanding all liabilities implied or otherwise, ummm, 
> hell, where was I...umm, no matter what happens, it is NOT, and 
> NEVER WILL BE, OUR FAULT! 
> The comments and opinions expressed herein are my own and NOT those 
> of my employer, who, if he knew I was sending emails and surfing the
> seamier side of the Internet, would cut off my manhood and feed it 
> to me for afternoon tea. 
> 

> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.
> com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to