Well, I'm not sure why this works, but it does. I took the knobs that I was using as controls and added them to the write node inside my gizmo, then picked them up onto the gizmo itself. If I get a chance I'll poke around with it and see if I can figure out why it works.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Brogan Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > Diogo, > That doesn't seem to have helped. As soon as I read your response, I > went 'oh duh', so I was surprised it didn't work out. Though, I know that > the filename is getting set correctly on the internal write node because I > have a callback that's creating the folders. > > > Elias, > We're actually trying to go the gizmo route this time. But, if I can't > get this to work, then we'll have to do something similar to what you > pointed out. We just wanted to give artist's a simplified ui for handling > writes. > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Elias Ericsson Rydberg < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> http://www.nukepedia.com/python/nodegraph/autowrite >> >> This is a different approach to the same problem. You can quite easily >> modify it to fit your own directory structure. >> >> Cheers, >> Elias >> >> 12 jul 2013 kl. 03:32 skrev Brogan Ross <[email protected]>: >> >> I'm running into an issue with putting a Write node inside a gizmo. >> It's a pretty simple idea. Give the users some values to change, and run >> a knob changed callback to set the values on the internal Write node. >> >> It works when you keep it setup as a Group, but as soon as I covert it to >> a gizmo, I get errors when trying to do a cmd line render >> >> writeGizmo.writeNode: //path/to/files: has no valid channels - nothing to >> write. >> >> I've tried picking the channel knob and putting on the gizmo, creating an >> expression to the Write node's channels knob, and just leaving it alone >> inside the gizmo. But no matter what I get that error during render. I >> know it must be possible to do this, since other studios have done it, and >> it's even in the docs. Anyone have any suggestions on what to look into? >> >> Thanks >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
