I agree that shipping a sane/sanitising doctest runner would go 95% of the way 
to alleviating my concerns.

Regarding 2.0, this is the whole point of semantic versioning: downstream 
packages can pin their dependency as 1.x and know that they
- will continue to work with any updates
- won’t make their users choose between new NumPy 1.x features and running 
their software.

The Python 3.x transition was a huge fail, but the version numbering was not 
the problem.

I do have sympathy for Ralf’s argument that "exact repr's are not part of the 
NumPy (or Python for that matter) backwards compatibility guarantees”. But it 
is such a foundational project in Scientific Python that I think extreme care 
is warranted, beyond any official guarantees. (Hence this thread, yes. Thank 
you!)

Incidentally, I don’t think "array( 1.)” is such a tragic repr fail. I actually 
would welcome it because I’ve tried to JSON-serialise these buggers quite a few 
times because I didn’t realise they were 0d arrays instead of floats. So why 
exactly is it so bad that there is a space there?

Anyway, all this is (mostly) moot if the next NumPy ships with this doctest++ 
thingy. That would be an enormously valuable contribution to the whole 
ecosystem.

Thanks,

Juan.

On 1 Jul 2017, 9:56 AM +1000, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Gael Varoquaux 
> <gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> >
> > One problem is that it becomes hard (impossible?) for downstream packages
> > such as scikit-learn to doctest under multiple versions of the numpy.
> > Past experience has shown that it could be useful.
>
> It's not that hard: wrap the new `set_printoptions(pad=True)` in a `try:` 
> block to catch the error under old versions.
>
> --
> Robert Kern
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to