> > > Rather, we might state that "At some point in the future, the NumPy > development team may no longer interested in maintaining workarounds for > specific subclasses, because other interfaces for extending NumPy are > believed to be more maintainable/preferred." > > That sentence I think covers it very well. Subclasses can and should be expected to evolve along with numpy, and if that means some numpy-version dependent parts, so be it (we have those now...). It is just that one should not remove functionality without providing the better alternative!
-- Marten
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
