On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:45 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That sentence I think covers it very well. Subclasses can and should be > expected to evolve along with numpy, and if that means some numpy-version > dependent parts, so be it (we have those now...). > My hope would be that NumPy gets out of the business of officially providing interfaces like subclassing that are this hard to maintain. In general, we try to hold ourselves to a higher standard of stable code, and this sets up unfortunate conflicts between the needs of different NumPy users. It is just that one should not remove functionality without providing the > better alternative! > Totally agreed!
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
