On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:05 PM Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > - It appears in astropy, dask, pandas, pint, scipy and TensorFlow. >> > > The only reason it appears in astropy is because of tests that Quantity > works correctly with it; we do not actually use it... > > So that's at least a few hits that do not count as arguments to keep it! > I'm in favour of a PendingDeprecationWarning. > We should at least first merge the PR that adds the same padding behavior to np.diff before doing this, then such a warning could say to just use that and get unchanged behavior. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
