On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:27 PM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < > m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:05 PM Stephan Hoyer <sho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> - It appears in astropy, dask, pandas, pint, scipy and TensorFlow. >>> >> >> The only reason it appears in astropy is because of tests that Quantity >> works correctly with it; we do not actually use it... >> >> So that's at least a few hits that do not count as arguments to keep it! >> I'm in favour of a PendingDeprecationWarning. >> > > We should at least first merge the PR that adds the same padding behavior > to np.diff before doing this, then such a warning could say to just use > that and get unchanged behavior. > The proposed behavior for np.diff() is different, but it should solve the same use-cases.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
