On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi, > > > No, I am saying we need at least five people who can commit to the main > > repo. That is the central repository model. > > Excellent - yes - that's reasonable. Then if you also agree to this: > > > No development in the main repo. Merges only. > > then we're all in full agreement. > > How does that differ from what we do now? Review? I develop in my own branches as is. > > Review is fine, and it would be nice if more people were reviewing code. > At > > the moment I think it is just Pauli, Stefan, and myself. > > Right - and that is partly because it so much harder to do review with > the model that we have at the moment, and partly because we don't yet > have the tradition in numpy of review. I think - honestly - if we're > going to be able to encourage and train new developers - we'll have to > get on that as soon as we can... > > True, but what happens when there is no review? I might point out that there are currently tickets with patches for review going back two years and reviewing a patch isn't *that* much harder than visiting github. Using git makes merging changes much easier, but it doesn't solve the review problem. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion