On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Pierre GM <pgmdevl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Just asking, >>> Should I backport some bugs that were corrected in 2.0 for numpy.ma ? I >>> don't have any particular in mind, but I'm sure there must be some... >>> >> That would be helpful. Please backport any bug fixes that you think are >> important. >> > > IIRC, there was also a fix that Josef wanted in one of the stats functions > before 1.5 but I don't remember which. Josef?
Not sure, The only things that I remember right now is that Alan wanted to have ddof instead of bias in cov for consistency in names across functions, and the usual >>> np.nansum([]) 1.#QNAN >>> np.nansum([np.nan]) 1.#QNAN Both will change current behavior and might need a depreciation cycle. I have to see if a search through the mailing list turns something up. Josef > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
