Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Travis Oliphant <tra...@continuum.io> wrote: > The C/C++ discussion is just getting started. Everyone should keep in mind > that this is not something that is going to happening quickly. This will > be a point of discussion throughout the year. I'm not a huge supporter of > C++, but C++11 does look like it's made some nice progress, and as I think > about making a core-set of NumPy into a library that can be called by > multiple languages (and even multiple implementations of Python), tempered > C++ seems like it might be an appropriate way to go.
Could you say more about this? Do you have any idea when the decision about C++ is likely to be made? At what point does it make most sense to make the argument for or against? Can you suggest a good way for us to be able to make more substantial arguments either way? Can you say a little more about your impression of the previous Cython refactor and why it was not successful? Thanks a lot, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
