On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Haase <seb.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > I feel that adding a method > .H() > would be the compromise !
Thinking about this more, I think it would just confuse most users... why .T and not .H; then you have to start explaining the underlying implementation detail. For users who already understand the implementation detail, finding .T.conj() would not be too hard. > (( I would not open the discussion about ndarray vs. matrix -- it gets > far to involving and we would be talking about far-future directions > instead of "a single letter addition", which abvious already has big > enough support and had so years ago)) I am willing to write up a NEP if there's any interest. The plan would be to remove the Matrix class from numpy over two or three releases, and publish it as a separate package on PyPi. Stéfan _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion