Haha. Honestly, guys! It's not about the money! :) On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:33 PM, cogmission1 . <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you should create a github issue for this :P > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If we ever create a system that can achieve that... meet your new god. >> --------- >> Matt Taylor >> OS Community Flag-Bearer >> Numenta >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Hernán Erasmo <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This rings a bell... >> > >> > 2014-12-02 23:43 GMT-03:00 Daniel Bell < >> [email protected]>: >> >> [...] >> >> Could nupic do this if we theoretically did have all the features that >> >> represent the state of the system? >> >> [...] >> > >> > "We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its >> past >> > and the cause of its future. An intellect which at a certain moment >> would >> > know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all >> items of >> > which nature is composed, if this intellect were also vast enough to >> submit >> > these data to analysis, it would embrace in a single formula the >> movements >> > of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the tiniest atom; >> for >> > such an intellect nothing would be uncertain and the future just like >> the >> > past would be present before its eyes." >> > >> > -Pierre Simon Laplace, A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities >> >> > > > -- > *We find it hard to hear what another is saying because of how loudly "who > one is", speaks...* >
