> On Oct 10, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Matthew Wire <m...@mjwconsult.co.uk> wrote: > > Here is the complete log for two minutes from startup. thank you
compressed to fit on the mailing list. > > On 9 October 2016 at 23:41, hyo...@gmail.com <hyo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 12.243069 send: Q1 > > 12.243087 command index: 0x03 > > 12.249983 read: (47 bytes) => 28 30 30 30 2e 30 20 30 30 30 2e 30 20 30 30 > > 30 2e 30 > > 12.250037 20 30 30 30 20 30 30 2e 30 20 30 2e 30 30 20 30 30 2e 30 20 30 > > 30 30 30 30 > > 12.250055 30 30 30 0d > > 12.250069 read: (000.0 000.0 000.0 000 00.0 0.00 00.0 00000000 > > Uh, a bit unexpected, but, at least, we got the right reply for that query. > I'll have to look again at the logs you posted on GitHub in order to > see if there is any difference with what the driver does now. > Meanwhile, can you post the complete log of the startup of the driver > (like the one you just posted, but not trimmed, and then let the > driver run for a couple of minutes)? > > <powercool.log>
powercool.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list Nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
