I would say the use case is interesting, and worth to work on it, so I support to adopt it and let’s treat it more critical to work out a good RFC. But I would recommend the authors to use Markdown or XML tools to rewrite the document, the format seems can be better to me 😊
I am interested in working on this work if it can be adopted. Thanks, Cheng From: rtgwg <rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Yingzhen Qu Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 8:02 PM To: RTGWG <rt...@ietf.org>; rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org>; nvo3-cha...@ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24 - 04/26/24) Hi, This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-07 - Multi-segment SD-WAN via Cloud DCs (ietf.org)<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan/> After the draft was presented at IETF 119, the chairs did a poll of the draft, and here are the questions and results: * "Do you think the multi-segment SD-WAN as described in the draft is a use case that the IETF should work on?" yes: 20 no: 9 no_opinion: 33 total: 84 * "Do you support adoption of this work in RTGWG?" yes: 9 no: 9 no_opinion: 25 total: 92 There is currently one IPR disclosure of this draft: IPR disclosures (ietf.org)<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft. The draft proposes a solution which extends GENEVE, so also copying NVO3 WG. If you don't think the draft should be adopted in RTGWG, please voice your opinion. Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by Apr 26th, 2024. Thanks, Yingzhen
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
