Hi all, this draft addresses the problems of burden of handling IPSec with a
reasonable GENEVE extension solution. I support the WG adoption of the draft.
黄光平 huangguangping
标准团队/有线规划部 Wireline architecture team./Wireline Product R&D Institute
南京市雨花区软件大道50号中兴通讯2号楼
R&D Building, ZTE
Corporation Software Road No.50,
Yuhua District, Nanjing, P..R.China, 210012
M: +86 13770311052
E: huang.guangp...@zte.com.cn
www.zte.com.cn
Original
From: YingzhenQu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>
To: RTGWG <rt...@ietf.org>;rtgwg-chairs
<rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org>;nvo3-cha...@ietf.org
<nvo3-cha...@ietf.org>;nvo3@ietf.org <nvo3@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年04月11日 02:02
Subject: WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24 -
04/26/24)
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rt...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Hi,
This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:
draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-07 - Multi-segment SD-WAN via Cloud DCs
(ietf.org)
After the draft was presented at IETF 119, the chairs did a poll of the draft,
and here are the questions and results:
"Do you think the multi-segment SD-WAN as described in the draft is a use case
that the IETF should work on?"
yes: 20 no: 9 no_opinion: 33 total: 84
"Do you support adoption of this work in RTGWG?"
yes: 9 no: 9 no_opinion: 25 total: 92
There is currently one IPR disclosure of this draft: IPR disclosures (ietf.org)
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR
that applies to the draft.
The draft proposes a solution which extends GENEVE, so also copying NVO3 WG. If
you don't think the draft should be adopted in RTGWG, please voice your opinion.
Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by Apr 26th,
2024.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
