If that anecdote is true, they're doing something wrong. What I hear is there
is no performance impact in general, with some reports of bulk data moving
faster with IPv6 (probably due to some kind of MTU issue).
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 14-Jul-22 09:16, Juha Saarinen wrote:
Anecdotally, I’m hearing that some smaller ISPs don’t run IPv6 on their
networks because it kills performance for their customers.
Doesn’t seem like the right way to fix the issue, but small budgets etc.
–
Juha Saarinen
https://twitter.com/juhasaarinen
On 14/07/2022, at 08:52, Matt Brown <m...@mattb.net.nz> wrote:
Globally https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
<https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html> shows steady growth, and
just passed the 40% native IPV6 mark. It's slow but steady progress given the
enormity of the protocol changes introduced and the lack of backward compatibility.
However
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption
<https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption>
does show NZ is lagging the average on only 19% - anecdotally, none of the 3 ISPs
I've used recently for various residential connections have made it possible to get
IPv6 - Starlink did for a few months initially, but then it disappeared when they
moved to their NZ routed ranges :(
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz
_______________________________________________
NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz
To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz
