Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reason for not embedding the Lucene and Solr related dependencies in > Oak bundles is to enable usage of same bundle jars in non OSGi env > without adding to size.
Good point. This line of thought actually suggests a way we could do *both* option 2 and 1 (or similarly for 3 and 4): Don't embed dependencies in the oak-lucene and oak-solr bundles, and provide a separate oak-fulltext bundle that embeds oak-lucene, oak-solr and all the currently non-OSGified dependencies. This way we can use the oak-fulltext bundle now without worrying about semantic versioning in Lucene/Solr, but be ready to switch to option 2 once such dependencies become available. As an added benefit the transitive Maven dependency structure will work correctly also for non-OSGi environments. BR, Jukka Zitting
