2014-03-10 17:15 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Chetan Mehrotra > <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Reason for not embedding the Lucene and Solr related dependencies in > > Oak bundles is to enable usage of same bundle jars in non OSGi env > > without adding to size. > > Good point. This line of thought actually suggests a way we could do > *both* option 2 and 1 (or similarly for 3 and 4): > > Don't embed dependencies in the oak-lucene and oak-solr bundles, and > provide a separate oak-fulltext bundle that embeds oak-lucene, > oak-solr and all the currently non-OSGified dependencies. > > This way we can use the oak-fulltext bundle now without worrying about > semantic versioning in Lucene/Solr, but be ready to switch to option 2 > once such dependencies become available. As an added benefit the > transitive Maven dependency structure will work correctly also for > non-OSGi environments. >
ok, so (in OSGi env) we would have oak-solr and oak-fulltext as fragments of oak-lucene (being the fragment host), that sounds like an ok scenario for me. Regards, Tommaso > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
