bhabegger commented on code in PR #2817: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/2817#discussion_r3010335090
########## oak-search-luceneNg/README.md: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +# oak-search-luceneNg + +Lucene 9 index provider for Oak (`type="lucene9"`). Review Comment: So the idea is that the code should be less sensitive to Lucene upgrades. However, I wasn't really sure about having a fixed name and the in some future having to have a lucene-ng-ng ;) Here we could interpret it as lucene *since* 9 and still use that for lucene 10, 11 up to and imaginary lucene 12 that breaks compatibility again (which might never happen as likely the APIs are more stable now). Personally, I fine with lucene-ng as I myself had doubts. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
