[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528976#comment-13528976
 ] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-189:
-----------------------------------

Thanks, this looks much better now.

The generic change I had in mind was part of the discussion around OAK-89. 
There I suggested not to use checked exceptions because it would lead to 
exactly this situation. I agreed to look at the respective issues on a by case 
basis but remained sceptical. See 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-89?focusedCommentId=13270024&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13270024.
 

So if we want to tackle this, we will most probably have to grep through all 
catch(.*) occurrences and check them manually. 
                
> Swallowed exceptions
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-189
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-189
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jcr
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>             Fix For: 0.6
>
>
> Exceptions should not be silently swallowed. This is currently done in 
> SessionDelegate$SessionNameMapper, methods getOakPrefix(), 
> getOakPrefixFromURI(), and getJcrPrefix(). Those methods catch 
> RepositoryException, don't log by default (only when using debug level), and 
> don't log the exception stack trace or throw an exception.
> Catching a very wide band of exceptions (RepositoryException) and then simply 
> returning null is not an acceptable solution in my view.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to